Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

RBC alloantibody prevalence and specificity in a Western Norwegian tertiary hospital.

Transfusion Medicine 2018 January 30
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Although several studies focus on red blood cell (RBC) alloantibody distribution in selected patient populations, few address the specificity and frequency in all relevant groups. This study reports alloantibody frequency, distribution and the relationship to age and gender in blood donors, pregnant women and potential recipients of blood products.

METHODS: This historical cohort study included 55 462 consecutive antibody screening tests from a tertiary Western Norwegian Hospital. Descriptive statistics were performed, and the results were compared with the literature.

RESULTS: The detection and immunisation frequency for the whole cohort were 0·39 and 0·51%, respectively, whereas the RBC alloantibody prevalence was 0·73%. The most frequent RBC alloantibodies were anti-E (20·1%), anti-M (18·7%), anti-K (9·8%), anti-D (8·9%) and anti-Fy(a) (7·0%). In pregnant women, the most frequent RBC alloantibodies were anti-M, anti-D and anti-Le(a) (20·8, 18·9 and 18·9%, respectively), whereas there was no anti-K detected. Anti-E and anti-M were the dominating RBC alloantibodies in the pre-transfusion testing of in-hospital patients (24·1 and 17·1%, respectively). Eighteen (9·2%) persons in the total cohort had two RBC alloantibodies, six persons had three alloantibodies, and two persons had four alloantibodies. Rh and K typing to prevent future immunisations was only performed in 21·0% of the individuals who presented with a new alloantibody; despite that, 50·5% of the detected alloantibodies had such specificities.

CONCLUSIONS: The immunisation frequency and the level of anti-K are low compared to national and international studies. Rh and K phenotype-matched blood transfusions might be a feasible future strategy to further decrease RBC alloantibodies.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app