Prevention of minor myocardial injury after elective percutaneous coronary intervention: comparison of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel.

BACKGROUND: Elective percutaneous coronary intervention (ePCI) may cause minor elevation of cardiac enzymes, so-called minor myocardial injury (MMI) which can be due to different pathophysiological mechanism (e.g. distal embolisation, side branch occlusion, increased platelet activation triggered by the intracoronary metallic stents). We aimed to compare the effectiveness of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel for the prevention of MMI and major adverse clinical events (MACEs) after ePCI.

METHODS: Study population consisted of two groups of patients based on the treatment: Group I, receiving clopidogrel (n = 104), Group II, receiving ticagrelor (n = 96). Cardiac troponin I (cTnI), CK-MB were studied before and 12 hours after the procedure. Elevation of cTnI greater than 0.06 ng/ml was considered as MMI. All patients were also evaluated for the MACEs (death, myocardial infarction, stroke and transient ischaemic attack).

RESULTS: Fifty-two of 200 patients (26%) had MMI after the procedure. The minor myocardial injury was significantly more prevalent in clopidogrel group than that of ticagrelor group (33% vs. 19%, p = .03). Myocardial infarction (MI) and MACEs were significantly higher in the clopidogrel group (15% vs. 6%, for MI, p = .04; 16% vs. 6%, for MACEs, p = .03, respectively). Multivariate analysis demonstrated antiplatelet treatment, saphenous graft intervention, type-C lesion as independent predictors of MMI.

CONCLUSIONS: Present study showed that the combination of ticagrelor and aspirin was more effective than combination of clopidogrel and aspirin in decreasing MMI and MACEs after elective stenting.