We have located links that may give you full text access.
Rim Plate Augmentation of the Posterolateral Bare Area of the Tibial Plateau Using a 3.5-mm Precontoured Locking Compression Plate: A Cadaveric Study.
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 2018 May
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of an additional rim plate [3.5-mm precontoured locking compression plate (LCP)] for stabilizing the posterolateral fragment in lateral tibial plateau fractures.
METHODS: Standard lateral locking plates [either a proximal tibial plate (PTP) or a proximal tibial locking plate (PTLP)] were applied to 40 matched pair knees from 20 fresh-frozen cadavers followed by the application of a secondary rim plate [variable angle LCP (VALCP)] posterior laterally.
RESULTS: The mean ratio of supported articular surface in the PTP group was 0.692, whereas that in the PTLP group was 0.569. This difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Additional rim plating with a VALCP could only be performed for 27 of 40 knees; 8 of 20 knees in the PTP group and 5 of 20 knees in the PTLP group could not be fitted with a VALCP due to anatomic limitations. For the total standard plating group alone, the mean ratio of supported articular surface was 0.596, whereas the mean ratio of supported articular surface with additional rim plating was 0.798 (P < 0.001). In contrast, additional rim plating was possible for more knees that received a PTLP than a PTP. Ultimately, there was no significant difference in the ratio of supported articular surface after additional rim plating between the 2 different types of standard plates (P = 0.087).
CONCLUSION: Our results identified a bare area in the posterolateral corner of the lateral plateau that was unsupported by rafting screws following conventional, 3.5-mm, precontoured LCP plating. Thus, additional rim plating may be useful for treating plateau fractures with a posterolateral fragment.
METHODS: Standard lateral locking plates [either a proximal tibial plate (PTP) or a proximal tibial locking plate (PTLP)] were applied to 40 matched pair knees from 20 fresh-frozen cadavers followed by the application of a secondary rim plate [variable angle LCP (VALCP)] posterior laterally.
RESULTS: The mean ratio of supported articular surface in the PTP group was 0.692, whereas that in the PTLP group was 0.569. This difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Additional rim plating with a VALCP could only be performed for 27 of 40 knees; 8 of 20 knees in the PTP group and 5 of 20 knees in the PTLP group could not be fitted with a VALCP due to anatomic limitations. For the total standard plating group alone, the mean ratio of supported articular surface was 0.596, whereas the mean ratio of supported articular surface with additional rim plating was 0.798 (P < 0.001). In contrast, additional rim plating was possible for more knees that received a PTLP than a PTP. Ultimately, there was no significant difference in the ratio of supported articular surface after additional rim plating between the 2 different types of standard plates (P = 0.087).
CONCLUSION: Our results identified a bare area in the posterolateral corner of the lateral plateau that was unsupported by rafting screws following conventional, 3.5-mm, precontoured LCP plating. Thus, additional rim plating may be useful for treating plateau fractures with a posterolateral fragment.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app