Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Surgical Approaches for the Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: Results of a Decision Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) often leads to cervical myelopathy. Although multiple procedures have been shown to be effective in the treatment of OPLL, outcomes are less predictable than in degenerative cervical myelopathy, and surgery is associated with high rates of complications and reoperation, which affect quality of life. In this study, we performed a decision analysis using postoperative complication data and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) utility scores to assess the average expected health utility and 5-year quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) associated with the most common surgical approaches for multilevel cervical OPLL.

METHODS: We searched Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for relevant articles published between 1990 and October 2017. Meta-analytically pooled complication data and HRQoL utility scores associated with each complication were evaluated in a long-term model.

RESULTS: The overall incidence of perioperative complications ranged from 6.2% for laminectomy alone to 11.0% for anterior decompression and fusion. Revision surgery for hardware/fusion failure or progression was highest for laminectomy alone (3.0%) and lowest for laminectomy and fusion (1.6%). Laminoplasty resulted in the highest 5-year QALYs gained, compared with laminectomy and anterior approaches (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in QALY gained between laminectomy-fusion and laminoplasty.

CONCLUSION: The results suggest that owing to the higher rates of complications associated with anterior cervical approaches, laminoplasty may result in improved long-term outcomes from an HRQoL standpoint. These findings may guide surgeons in cases where either procedure is a reasonable option.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app