COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparison of Enalapril, Candesartan and Intralesional Triamcinolone in Reducing Hypertrophic Scar Development: An Experimental Study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of oral enalapril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I), oral candesartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), and intralesional corticosteroid treatments in reducing scar formation.

METHODS: Twenty male rabbits were divided into five study groups: A (sham), B (control), C (ACE-I), D (ARB) and E (intralesional corticosteroid). The rabbit ear hypertrophic scar model was used. The hypertrophic scars were photographed and analyzed with the program ImageJ quantitatively to determine the degree of collagen fibers. The scar elevation index (SEI) was calculated at the end of the 40th day. Tissue samples were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and Masson's trichrome and examined under light microscopy for the determination of fibroblast number, epithelization, vascularization, inflammation and fibrosis.

RESULTS: The SEI was the highest in the control group with the highest number of fibroblasts under the epithelium. In the steroid group, the SEI was significantly lower than both the ACE-I (p: 0.02) and ARB (p: 0.001) groups. The density of type 1 collagen fibers was the lowest in the control group, whereas type 3 collagen fibers were highest in that group. The ACE-I and ARB groups were similar regarding densities of type 1 and type 3 collagen fibers. The density of type 1 collagen fibers was the highest in the steroid group, whereas the density of type 3 collagen fibers was the lowest in that group.

CONCLUSIONS: Enalapril, candesartan and intralesional steroid therapies were all effective in reducing scar tissue development; however, enalapril and steroid groups revealed better results.

NO LEVEL ASSIGNED: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app