The Current Status of Outcomes-Based Contracting for Manufacturers and Payers: An AMCP Membership Survey.

BACKGROUND: As the United States health care system shifts from traditional volume-based payments to value-based payments, outcomes-based contracts (OBCs) are gaining popularity among payers and manufacturers as a mechanism for the shift toward value. Under this model, stakeholders hope to align drug payment and value to real-world performance metrics (e.g., biomarkers and health care resource utilization).

OBJECTIVE: To understand the experiences, perceptions, and needs of payers and manufacturers related to OBCs.

METHODS: The Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP) and Xcenda conducted an online survey with AMCP payer and manufacturer members. Participants were asked a series of questions regarding their use of OBCs, barriers to implementation, and elements required in establishing successful OBCs. The importance and urgency of specific impediments to successful OBC implementation were also assessed.

RESULTS: The survey was fielded May 12, 2017, to June 7, 2017, yielding 65 responses (35 payers/30 manufacturers). While a minority of payers/manufacturers had at least 1 OBC in place (20%/33%), a majority had interest in future OBC use (71%/63%). Among those with at least 1 OBC in place, 86%/80% of payers/manufacturers had renewed at least 1 OBC in the past 5 years. All payers and 60% of manufacturers with OBCs included compliance measures. Improvement in clinical outcomes was also common (71%/70%) (e.g., reaching set laboratory values goals), and 71%/60% included avoidance of unnecessary medical resource use (e.g., hospitalization and emergency department visit). The barrier most frequently identified by payers in implementing OBCs was evidence that OBCs reduced pharmacy spending (60%), while manufacturers identified the inability to obtain accurate data/outcome measures (73%) as a major limiting factor. Payers/manufacturers endorsed the use of easily measurable outcomes (91%/100%) as most important in establishing successful OBCs. Manufacturers, and to a lesser extent payers, indicated that regulations and legal issues need to be addressed to make progress in OBC implementation (e.g., safe harbor for preapproval health care economic information [77%/46%] and exemption of OBCs for best-price requirements [83%/51%]). The only exception was the clarification of regulations for discussing information outside of an FDA-approved label, in which both manufacturers and payers indicated a very strong need (100%) to be addressed.

CONCLUSIONS: Surveyed AMCP members are interested in OBCs and recognize their alignment to societal health goals and health care affordability, although actual use of these contracts has been somewhat limited to date. Results from this survey indicate that there is potential for OBC use to increase as barriers and limitations are addressed.

DISCLOSURES: This research was sponsored by the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy and Xcenda. Duhig, Kaufman, and Hughes are employed by Xcenda. Saha is employed by the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. Smith has nothing disclose. Study concept and design were contributed by Duhig, Kaufman, Saha, and Hughes. Kaufman and Hughes collected the data, and data interpretation was performed by all the authors. The manuscript was written by Saha, Smith, and Duhig, along with Kaufman and Hughes.