Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Terrestrial toxicity model for nickel: Comparison of culture method and modeling approaches.

In metal toxicity model studies of soil-plant systems, hydroponic culture is often employed to simulate soil conditions, but the validity of this approach has not been examined. The present study evaluated Ni toxicity to wheat root elongation using models developed in hydroponic and sand cultures and then compared the results with those obtained from real soils. Three mechanism toxicity models were examined: the free ion activity model, the biotic ligand model (BLM), and the Gouy-Chapman-Stern model. After being developed in hydroponic and sand culture bioassays, the models were validated with 18 soils from across China. The results showed that more accurate predictions were obtained with sand rather than hydroponic bioassays. Dissolved organic matter exerted only a limited effect on Ni toxicity, whereas an important role was found for osmotic effects. Of the 3 models, the sand-based BLM best predicted Ni toxicity to wheat root elongation (root-mean-square error = 16.2% and R2  = 0.79) and was as good as the BLM estimated directly from soils. The present study shows that sand is a better matrix than solution for root elongation bioassays of Ni toxicity and that osmotic effects must be taken into account in evaluating soil conditions. Environ Toxicol Chem 2018;37:1349-1358. © 2018 SETAC.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app