We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical value of [18F]FDG-PET/CT and 3D-black-blood 3T-MRI for the diagnosis of large vessel vasculitis and single-organ vasculitis of the aorta.
Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2018 January 3
BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the clinical value of a 3D-T1w turbo-spin-echo (TSE) sequence and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography / computed tomography ([18F]FDG- PET/CT) for the diagnosis of active large vessel vasculitis (LVV) and single-organ vasculitis (SOV) of the aorta.
METHODS: 24 patients with suspected vasculitis who underwent MRI and PET/CT were retrospectively evaluated. MRI was analyzed for concentric contrast enhancement and wall thickening, and flow artifact intensity (4-point-scales). PET/CT analysis comprised qualitative, quantitative and semiquantitative methods. Imaging findings were correlated with final diagnosis derived from the clinical follow-up data.
RESULTS: 15 of 24 patients had a clinically confirmed active vasculitis, two had inactive vasculitis and 7 no vasculitis. [18F]FDG-PET/CT and 3D-T1w TSE-MRI revealed both a high diagnostic accuracy of 88% and 83%, respectively. In patients in whom both PET/CT and MRI showed concordant findings (19 patients), the accuracy increased to 95% with a high positive predictive value (92%) and negative predictive value (100%); thus a correct diagnosis was obtained in 18 of 19 patients. Among the five patients with discordant findings PET/CT correctly identified the two patients without active vasculitis while rated false positive on MRI. Of the three remaining patients with active vasculitis, two were correctly identified by MRI and one by PET/CT.
CONCLUSIONS: 3D-T1w TSE-MRI and [18F]FDG-PET/CT are both useful in the diagnosis of active vasculitis with high diagnostic accuracies. The diagnostic accuracy was even optimized by combining the two analysis methods. Therefore, there might be substantial potential for the application of whole-body hybrid PET/MRI in the evaluation of vasculitis in future studies.
METHODS: 24 patients with suspected vasculitis who underwent MRI and PET/CT were retrospectively evaluated. MRI was analyzed for concentric contrast enhancement and wall thickening, and flow artifact intensity (4-point-scales). PET/CT analysis comprised qualitative, quantitative and semiquantitative methods. Imaging findings were correlated with final diagnosis derived from the clinical follow-up data.
RESULTS: 15 of 24 patients had a clinically confirmed active vasculitis, two had inactive vasculitis and 7 no vasculitis. [18F]FDG-PET/CT and 3D-T1w TSE-MRI revealed both a high diagnostic accuracy of 88% and 83%, respectively. In patients in whom both PET/CT and MRI showed concordant findings (19 patients), the accuracy increased to 95% with a high positive predictive value (92%) and negative predictive value (100%); thus a correct diagnosis was obtained in 18 of 19 patients. Among the five patients with discordant findings PET/CT correctly identified the two patients without active vasculitis while rated false positive on MRI. Of the three remaining patients with active vasculitis, two were correctly identified by MRI and one by PET/CT.
CONCLUSIONS: 3D-T1w TSE-MRI and [18F]FDG-PET/CT are both useful in the diagnosis of active vasculitis with high diagnostic accuracies. The diagnostic accuracy was even optimized by combining the two analysis methods. Therefore, there might be substantial potential for the application of whole-body hybrid PET/MRI in the evaluation of vasculitis in future studies.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app