Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Pharmacological Inhibition of NOS Activates ASK1/JNK Pathway Augmenting Docetaxel-Mediated Apoptosis in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Purpose: Chemoresistance in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is associated with the activation of a survival mechanism orchestrated by the endoplasmic reticulum (EnR) stress response and by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). Our aim was to determine the effects of pharmacologic NOS inhibition on TNBC. Experimental Design: TNBC cell lines, SUM-159PT, MDA-MB-436, and MDA-MB-468, were treated with docetaxel and NOS inhibitor (L-NMMA) for 24, 48, and 72 hours. Apoptosis was assessed by flow cytometry using Annexin-V and propidium iodide. Western blot was used to assess ER stress and apoptosis, and rtPCR was used to evaluate s-XBP1. TNBC patient-derived xenografts (PDX) were treated either with vehicle, docetaxel, or combination therapy (NOS inhibition + docetaxel). Mouse weight and tumor volumes were recorded twice weekly. Docetaxel concentration was determined using mass spectrometry. To quantify proliferation and apoptosis, PDX tumor samples were stained using Ki67 and TUNEL assay. Results: In vitro, L-NMMA ameliorated the iNOS upregulation associated with docetaxel. Apoptosis increased when TNBC cells were treated with combination therapy. In TNBC PDXs, combination therapy significantly reduced tumor volume growth and increased survival proportions. In the BCM-5998 PDX model, intratumoral docetaxel concentration was higher in mice receiving combination therapy. Coupling docetaxel with NOS inhibition increased EnR-stress response via coactivation of ATF4 and CHOP, which triggered the pASK1/JNK proapoptotic pathway, promoting cleavage of caspases 3 and 9. Conclusions: iNOS is a critical target for docetaxel resistance in TNBC. Pharmacologic inhibition of NOS enhanced chemotherapy response in TNBC PDX models. Combination therapy may improve prognosis and prevent relapse in TNBC patients who have failed conventional chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res; 24(5); 1152-62. ©2018 AACR .

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app