Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

A survey of international antisepsis procedures for neuraxial catheterisation in labour.

BACKGROUND: Neuraxial analgesia during labour is a mainstay of anaesthetic practice globally. Despite the potential for significant neurological and infectious complications, international antisepsis practices for neuraxial anaesthesia vary widely.

AIMS: The primary aim of this study was to clarify international antisepsis practices prior to neuraxial analgesia in labour. The secondary aim was to determine an approximate international incidence of neuraxial infections and neurological complications secondary to neuraxial analgesia techniques in labour.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Heads of Departments of Anaesthesiology were invited to complete an online questionnaire exploring antisepsis practices and complications of neuraxial catheterisation. Data from 151 institutions in 13 countries were collected over 11months.

RESULTS: Data were collected for an estimated 6008540 deliveries and 3770800 neuraxial catheterisations. The average annual birth rate per institution was 3979 births, with an average of 2497 neuraxial catheterizations (representing 62.8% of deliveries). Forty-nine percent of responders reported always wearing sterile gowns for the procedure, whereas 47.7% never wear gowns. Chlorhexidine was used by 88.1% of those surveyed, and 96.7% always wore facemasks. Thirty-four percent of institutions reported infectious complications over a 10-year period. Ninety neuraxial infections were estimated, giving an approximate incidence of 1:41898 catheterisations (2.39 infections per 100000 catheterisations). A total of 202 neurological complications were reported, with an approximate incidence of 1:18667 catheterisations (5.36 neurological complications per 100000 catheterisations).

CONCLUSION: The survey demonstrated marked variation in aseptic practice between both responding centres and countries. The incidence of infectious and neurological complications secondary to neuraxial catherisation in labour has been approximated.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app