We have located links that may give you full text access.
Changes in patient characteristics, glucose lowering treatment, glycemic control and complications in type 2 diabetes in general practices (Disease Analyzer, Germany: 2008-2016).
Postgraduate Medicine 2018 March
OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to examine long-term changes in type 2 diabetes patient characteristics, diabetes treatment, control and complications in general practices.
METHODS: All type 2 diabetes patients were identified in a representative general practice database (Disease Analyser, Germany) in three periods (01/2008-12/2008: n = 90.866, 818 practices, mean age (SD): 67.6 (12.1) years, 51% males; 01/2012-12/2012: n = 179.923, 1.158 practices, 68.3 (12.6) years, 51% males; 10/2015-09/2016: n = 201.667, 1.184 practices, 68.2 (12.9) years, 52% males). Chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used for testing differences (2008 vs. 2015/16).
RESULTS: The mean number of type 2 patients per practice increased (2008: 111; 2015/16: 170). The proportion of retirees declined (74% vs. 61%) and patients in the working population increased (18% vs. 28%) (all p < 0.001). There were no relevant changes in mean HbA1c (7.1% vs. 7.2%), fasting blood glucose (141 mg/dl vs. 144 mg/dl) and BMI (31 kg/m2 vs. 32 kg/m2 ), whereas total cholesterol (204 mg/dl vs. 196 mg/dl) and triglycerides (159 mg/dl vs. 153 mg/dl) slightly declined (all p < 0.001). Prescription use of metformin, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) and sodium dependent glucose transporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists enlarged (dual or triple combinations) while sulfonylurea use decreased. Prevalence of polyneuropathy (6.2% vs. 8.6%), nephropathy (1.9% vs. 3.2%) and depression (7.6% vs. 10.0%) rised (all p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: General practitioners play a key role in diabetes care, increasingly treating type 2 diabetes patients in the working population. There was no change in glycemic control over the study period (2008-2016). The use of glucose-lowering drug combinations increased and microvascular complications were more often recorded.
METHODS: All type 2 diabetes patients were identified in a representative general practice database (Disease Analyser, Germany) in three periods (01/2008-12/2008: n = 90.866, 818 practices, mean age (SD): 67.6 (12.1) years, 51% males; 01/2012-12/2012: n = 179.923, 1.158 practices, 68.3 (12.6) years, 51% males; 10/2015-09/2016: n = 201.667, 1.184 practices, 68.2 (12.9) years, 52% males). Chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used for testing differences (2008 vs. 2015/16).
RESULTS: The mean number of type 2 patients per practice increased (2008: 111; 2015/16: 170). The proportion of retirees declined (74% vs. 61%) and patients in the working population increased (18% vs. 28%) (all p < 0.001). There were no relevant changes in mean HbA1c (7.1% vs. 7.2%), fasting blood glucose (141 mg/dl vs. 144 mg/dl) and BMI (31 kg/m2 vs. 32 kg/m2 ), whereas total cholesterol (204 mg/dl vs. 196 mg/dl) and triglycerides (159 mg/dl vs. 153 mg/dl) slightly declined (all p < 0.001). Prescription use of metformin, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) and sodium dependent glucose transporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists enlarged (dual or triple combinations) while sulfonylurea use decreased. Prevalence of polyneuropathy (6.2% vs. 8.6%), nephropathy (1.9% vs. 3.2%) and depression (7.6% vs. 10.0%) rised (all p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: General practitioners play a key role in diabetes care, increasingly treating type 2 diabetes patients in the working population. There was no change in glycemic control over the study period (2008-2016). The use of glucose-lowering drug combinations increased and microvascular complications were more often recorded.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app