Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

The comparison of umbilical cord arterial blood lactate and pH values for predicting short-term neonatal outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Current clinical practice of assessing neonatal condition is based on evaluation of umbilical cord arterial blood pH value rather than lactate. However, evidence shows that lactate is direct and more predictive measurement than pH or at least of equal importance. This study is to assess and compare umbilical cord arterial lactate and pH values for predicting short-term neonatal outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the tertiary level hospital, were arterial umbilical cord blood sampling was collected according to the standard procedures. Neonatal morbidity was registered if at least one of the following conditions was noted: Apgar score at 1 min after delivery was 6 or lower, resuscitation performed, including assisted ventilation and requirement of admission to neonatal intensive care unit. Mothers-newborns pairs were allocated into two groups: newborns exposed to perinatal hypoxia (group 1) and observed as healthy newborns (group 2). Receiver operating characteristics curves (ROC) were generated to assess the predictive ability of pH and lactate for the short-term neonatal outcomes.

RESULTS: 901 neonates born at ≥37 weeks of gestation were included. Newborns exposed to perinatal hypoxia (group 1) encompassed 39 (4.3%) patients, and observed as healthy (group 2) - 862 (95.7%). Arterial umbilical cord blood pH in group 1 was 7.160 ± 0.126 as compared to 7.314 ± 0.083 in group 2; p < 0.001. Mean arterial lactate was significantly higher in group 1 than group 2 (6.423 ± 2.335 as compared to 3.600 ± 1.833; p < 0.001). The difference between areas under ROC curves representing pH and lactate was not significant (0.848 and 0.831 respectively; p = 0.6132).

CONCLUSION: Umbilical cord arterial lactate and pH predicted short-term neonatal outcomes with similar efficacies.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app