We have located links that may give you full text access.
Preoperative biliary drainage adversely affects surgical outcomes in periampullary cancer: a retrospective and propensity score-matched analysis.
BACKGROUND: The use of preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) for managing patients with periampullary cancer awaiting surgery remains controversial. The impact of PBD status and type on surgical outcomes has not been established, leading to a lack of consensus. We aimed to evaluate the impact of PBD on short-term surgical outcomes in curatively resected periampullary cancer.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from patients undergoing curative periampullary cancer resection. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed to adjust for clinical differences. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine independent risk factors for complications.
RESULTS: The overall complication rate was significantly higher in patients who underwent PBD (P = 0.027). Additionally, complication rates were significantly higher in the endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) group than in the percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) group (P < 0.001). After propensity score matching, overall complication rates in patients receiving EBD (P < 0.001) were significantly higher. PBD type and diagnosis were independent risk factors for complications (hazard ratios: 1.927 for EBD; 1.921 for biliary tract cancer).
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative biliary drainage, especially EBD, should not be routinely performed in patients awaiting surgery for periampullary cancer, as it increases the risk of complications.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from patients undergoing curative periampullary cancer resection. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed to adjust for clinical differences. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine independent risk factors for complications.
RESULTS: The overall complication rate was significantly higher in patients who underwent PBD (P = 0.027). Additionally, complication rates were significantly higher in the endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) group than in the percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) group (P < 0.001). After propensity score matching, overall complication rates in patients receiving EBD (P < 0.001) were significantly higher. PBD type and diagnosis were independent risk factors for complications (hazard ratios: 1.927 for EBD; 1.921 for biliary tract cancer).
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative biliary drainage, especially EBD, should not be routinely performed in patients awaiting surgery for periampullary cancer, as it increases the risk of complications.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app