We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Validation Studies
Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Cyclosporine Analysis in Human Whole Blood and Comparison With an Antibody-Conjugated Magnetic Immunoassay.
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring 2018 Februrary
BACKGROUND: Various immunoassays have been used for cyclosporine A (CsA) analysis in human whole blood; however, they could not fully satisfy the requirements of criteria for accuracy and specificity in CsA measurement. The liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry is a gold method for CsA analysis. The aim of the study was to develop and validate an ultra-high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) method for CsA analysis and establish its agreement with an antibody-conjugated magnetic immunoassay (ACMIA) in clinical sample analysis.
METHODS: An UHPLC-MS/MS method for CsA analysis in human whole blood was developed, validated, and applied in 85 samples, which were also tested by ACMIA. The agreement between UHPLC-MS/MS and ACMIA was evaluated by Bland-Altman plot.
RESULTS: The calibration range was 5-2000 ng/mL. The inaccuracy and imprecision were -4.60% to 5.56% and less than 8.57%, respectively. The internal standard-normalized recovery and matrix factor were 100.4%-110.5% and 93.5%-107.6%, respectively. The measurements of ACMIA and UHPLC-MS/MS were strongly correlated (r > 0.98). Evaluated by Bland-Altman plot, the 95% limit of agreement of the ACMIA:UHPLC-MS/MS ratio was 88.7%-165.6%, and the mean bias of the ratio was 21.1%.
CONCLUSIONS: A rapid, simple, accurate, and reliable UHPLC-MS/MS method for CsA analysis in human whole blood was developed, validated, and applied in 85 samples. On average, 21.1% overestimation was observed in ACMIA compared with that in the UHPLC-MS/MS. Further and larger studies are required to identify whether this degree of variance could be accepted by clinicians.
METHODS: An UHPLC-MS/MS method for CsA analysis in human whole blood was developed, validated, and applied in 85 samples, which were also tested by ACMIA. The agreement between UHPLC-MS/MS and ACMIA was evaluated by Bland-Altman plot.
RESULTS: The calibration range was 5-2000 ng/mL. The inaccuracy and imprecision were -4.60% to 5.56% and less than 8.57%, respectively. The internal standard-normalized recovery and matrix factor were 100.4%-110.5% and 93.5%-107.6%, respectively. The measurements of ACMIA and UHPLC-MS/MS were strongly correlated (r > 0.98). Evaluated by Bland-Altman plot, the 95% limit of agreement of the ACMIA:UHPLC-MS/MS ratio was 88.7%-165.6%, and the mean bias of the ratio was 21.1%.
CONCLUSIONS: A rapid, simple, accurate, and reliable UHPLC-MS/MS method for CsA analysis in human whole blood was developed, validated, and applied in 85 samples. On average, 21.1% overestimation was observed in ACMIA compared with that in the UHPLC-MS/MS. Further and larger studies are required to identify whether this degree of variance could be accepted by clinicians.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app