We have located links that may give you full text access.
Pole lengths influence O 2 -cost during double poling in highly trained cross-country skiers.
European Journal of Applied Physiology 2018 Februrary
PURPOSE: In elite cross-country skiing, double poling is used in different terrain. This study compared O2 -cost and kinematics during double poling with four different pole lengths [self-selected (SS), SS - 5 cm, SS + 5 cm, SS + 10 cm] at Low versus Moderate incline.
METHODS: Thirteen highly trained male cross-country skiers (mean ± SD 23 ± 3 years; 182 ± 4 cm; 77 ± 6 kg) completed eight submaximal trials with roller skis on a treadmill at two conditions: "Low incline" (1.7°; 4.5 m s-1 ) and "Moderate incline" (4.5°; 2.5 m s-1 ) with each of the four pole lengths. O2 -cost and 3D body kinematics were assessed in each trial.
RESULTS: In Low incline, SS + 10 cm induced a lower O2 -cost than all the other pole lengths [P < 0.05; effect size (ES) 0.5-0.8], whereas no differences were found between the remaining pole lengths (P > 0.05; ES 0.2-0.4). In Moderate incline, significant differences between all pole lengths were found for O2 -cost, with SS - 5 cm > SS > SS + 5 cm > SS + 10 cm (P < 0.05; ES 0.6-1.8). The relative differences in O2 -cost between SS and the other pole lengths were greater in Moderate incline than Low incline (SS - 5 cm; 1.5%, ES 0.8, SS + 5 cm; 1.3%, ES 1.0, and SS + 10 cm; 1.9%, ES 1.0, all P < 0.05). No difference was found in cycle, poling or reposition times between pole lengths. However, at both conditions a smaller total vertical displacement of center of mass was observed with SS + 10 cm compared to the other pole lengths.
CONCLUSION: Increasing pole length from SS - 5 cm to SS + 10 cm during double poling induced lower O2 -cost and this advantage was greater in Moderate compared to Low incline.
METHODS: Thirteen highly trained male cross-country skiers (mean ± SD 23 ± 3 years; 182 ± 4 cm; 77 ± 6 kg) completed eight submaximal trials with roller skis on a treadmill at two conditions: "Low incline" (1.7°; 4.5 m s-1 ) and "Moderate incline" (4.5°; 2.5 m s-1 ) with each of the four pole lengths. O2 -cost and 3D body kinematics were assessed in each trial.
RESULTS: In Low incline, SS + 10 cm induced a lower O2 -cost than all the other pole lengths [P < 0.05; effect size (ES) 0.5-0.8], whereas no differences were found between the remaining pole lengths (P > 0.05; ES 0.2-0.4). In Moderate incline, significant differences between all pole lengths were found for O2 -cost, with SS - 5 cm > SS > SS + 5 cm > SS + 10 cm (P < 0.05; ES 0.6-1.8). The relative differences in O2 -cost between SS and the other pole lengths were greater in Moderate incline than Low incline (SS - 5 cm; 1.5%, ES 0.8, SS + 5 cm; 1.3%, ES 1.0, and SS + 10 cm; 1.9%, ES 1.0, all P < 0.05). No difference was found in cycle, poling or reposition times between pole lengths. However, at both conditions a smaller total vertical displacement of center of mass was observed with SS + 10 cm compared to the other pole lengths.
CONCLUSION: Increasing pole length from SS - 5 cm to SS + 10 cm during double poling induced lower O2 -cost and this advantage was greater in Moderate compared to Low incline.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app