We have located links that may give you full text access.
Margin Assessment in Renal Surgery Using a Handheld Optical Coherence Tomography Probe.
Urology 2018 March
OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of a handheld optical coherence tomography (OCT) probe for the evaluation of intraoperative surgical margins during partial nephrectomy (PN).
METHODS: In an initial feasibility study, a radical nephrectomy specimen with a 9-cm tumor was cut into 19 sections, exposing 0 mm (n = 8), 1 mm (n = 6), and 2 mm (n = 5) gross margins. OCT was used to determine the margin width in each specimen. Second, a prospective ex vivo assessment of 15 PN tumor specimens was performed with OCT to determine margin status and to measure the attenuation coefficient of tumor and renal parenchyma.
RESULTS: Median OCT margin width measurements for sectioned samples were 0 mm, 0.9 mm (range 0.7-2.9 mm), and 2.7 (range 1.65-2.8 mm) for grossly 0 mm (positive), 1 mm, and 2 mm margins, respectively. The difference between measurements from all margin groups was statistically significant (P <.04). The sensitivity and specificity for identifying positive margins were both 100%. In the PN specimens, OCT correctly found that all specimens had negative margins (within <.0001).
CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated the feasibility of using a handheld OCT probe to assess margins ex vivo during PN. OCT may reduce the need for intraoperative frozen section and aid in minimizing parenchymal excision.
METHODS: In an initial feasibility study, a radical nephrectomy specimen with a 9-cm tumor was cut into 19 sections, exposing 0 mm (n = 8), 1 mm (n = 6), and 2 mm (n = 5) gross margins. OCT was used to determine the margin width in each specimen. Second, a prospective ex vivo assessment of 15 PN tumor specimens was performed with OCT to determine margin status and to measure the attenuation coefficient of tumor and renal parenchyma.
RESULTS: Median OCT margin width measurements for sectioned samples were 0 mm, 0.9 mm (range 0.7-2.9 mm), and 2.7 (range 1.65-2.8 mm) for grossly 0 mm (positive), 1 mm, and 2 mm margins, respectively. The difference between measurements from all margin groups was statistically significant (P <.04). The sensitivity and specificity for identifying positive margins were both 100%. In the PN specimens, OCT correctly found that all specimens had negative margins (within <.0001).
CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated the feasibility of using a handheld OCT probe to assess margins ex vivo during PN. OCT may reduce the need for intraoperative frozen section and aid in minimizing parenchymal excision.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app