We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical Significance of Biofilm on Silicone Tubes Removed From Patients With Nasolacrimal Duct Stenosis.
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 2018 March
PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between the optical density of biofilms on silicone tubes and surgical outcomes.
METHODS: A total of 43 silicone tubes from 33 patients with nasolacrimal duct stenosis were enrolled at 6 months after bicanalicular silicone tube intubation. The removed silicone tubes were divided into 2 segments. One segment of silicone tube was cultured while the other segment was used to measure optical density of biofilm. Each segment was divided into 3 pieces according to average normal human nasolacrimal anatomy. The first piece was located from puncta to lacrimal sac. The second piece was inside the nasolacrimal duct. The third piece was in the nasal cavity. Surgical outcome was evaluated at postoperative 12 months based on Munk score and fluorescein dye disappearance test.
RESULTS: A total of 31 (72.1%) patients were surgically successful while 12 (27.9%) patients had surgical failure with persistent epiphora. In the second piece of silicone tube, the mean optical density of biofilm was 0.2654 nm in the surgical success group and 0.4472 nm in the surgical failure group. These results showed statistically significant (P < 0.01) difference. The most frequently isolated organism was Staphylococcus aureus in the surgical success group (7 of 31 patients, 22.6%). It was Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the surgical failure group (6 of 12 patients, 50%).
CONCLUSION: This is the first study that determines the relationship between biofilm on silicone tube and surgical outcome. Biofilm formed on silicone tubes in nasolacrimal duct might cause surgical failure.
METHODS: A total of 43 silicone tubes from 33 patients with nasolacrimal duct stenosis were enrolled at 6 months after bicanalicular silicone tube intubation. The removed silicone tubes were divided into 2 segments. One segment of silicone tube was cultured while the other segment was used to measure optical density of biofilm. Each segment was divided into 3 pieces according to average normal human nasolacrimal anatomy. The first piece was located from puncta to lacrimal sac. The second piece was inside the nasolacrimal duct. The third piece was in the nasal cavity. Surgical outcome was evaluated at postoperative 12 months based on Munk score and fluorescein dye disappearance test.
RESULTS: A total of 31 (72.1%) patients were surgically successful while 12 (27.9%) patients had surgical failure with persistent epiphora. In the second piece of silicone tube, the mean optical density of biofilm was 0.2654 nm in the surgical success group and 0.4472 nm in the surgical failure group. These results showed statistically significant (P < 0.01) difference. The most frequently isolated organism was Staphylococcus aureus in the surgical success group (7 of 31 patients, 22.6%). It was Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the surgical failure group (6 of 12 patients, 50%).
CONCLUSION: This is the first study that determines the relationship between biofilm on silicone tube and surgical outcome. Biofilm formed on silicone tubes in nasolacrimal duct might cause surgical failure.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
The Effect of Albumin Administration in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis.Critical Care Medicine 2024 Februrary 8
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app