[Long term safety and efficacy of a novel abluminal groove-filled biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent for the treatment of coronary de novo lesions].

Objective: To compare the long term safety and efficacy of the novel abluminal groove-filled biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent(Firehawk stent) and permanent polymer coating everolimus eluting stent(Xience V stent) for the treatment of coronary de novo lesions. Methods: This prospective, multi-center, non-inferiority, randomized control trial(TARGETⅠ trial) was performed between August 2010 and April 2011, a total of 460 patients with primary, de novo, single vessel and single coronary lesion from 16 medical centers were enrolled. The diameter stenosis of target lesion was ≥70%, and lesion length was≤24 mm. The patients were randomly assigned to treatment with Firehawk stent (Firehawk stent group) or Xience V stent (Xience V stent group) groups by a web-based allocation system and was stratified by center. The late lumen loss after 9 months, target lesion failure (TLF) which was a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia driven target lesion revascularization, patient-oriented composite endpoint (PoCE) which was a composite of all cause death, all cause myocardial infarction, or any revascularization, and stent thrombosis after 5 years were compared between the two groups. Results: (1) There were 2 patients without stent implantation dropped out of this trial. There were 227 patients in Firehawk stent group, and 231 patients in Xience V stent group. The baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups(all P >0.05). (2) The 9 months late lumen loss in Firehawk stent group was non-inferior to that in Xience V stent group ((0.13±0.24)mm vs. (0.13±0.18)mm, P =0.94). (3) A total of 442 (96.5%) patients completed 5 years clinical follow-up. There were no significant differences on 5-year TLF rate (6.0%(13/217) vs. 6.7% (15/225), P =0.77) and PoCE rate (12.0%(26/217) vs. 17.8% (40/225), P =0.09) between the Firehawk stent group and Xience V stent group. (4) Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that TLF rates between 1-5 years were similar in Firehawk stent group and Xience V stent group (5.7% and 6.6% respectively, HR =0.88, 95% CI 0.42-1.84, P =0.72). Land-Mark analysis showed that TLF rates bewteen 1-5 years were similar in Firehawk stent group and Xience V stent group (3.6% and 4.4% respectively, HR =0.83, 95% CI 0.34-2.00, P =0.67). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that PoCE rates between 1-5 years were also similar in Firehawk stent group and Xience V stent group (11.4% and 17.3% respectively, HR =0.64, 95% CI 0.39-1.04, P =0.07). Land-Mark analysis showed that PoCE rates after 5 years were similar in Firehawk stent group and Xience V stent group (8.4% and 10.0% respectively, HR =0.66, 95% CI 0.40-1.10, P =0.11). (5) No stent thrombosis was documented in Firehawk stent group during the 5 years follow-up period, and there was 1 case of stent thrombosis in Xience V stent group after 3 years of stent implantation. Conclusion: TARGETⅠ trial results of 5 years follow up indicate the novel Firehawk stent have a durable safety and efficacy profile which is comparable to the Xience V stent in treating patients with single de novo coronary lesion. Clinical Trial Registration North American Clinical Trial Registration Center, NCT01196819.