[Prewarming according to the AWMF S3 guidelines on preventing inadvertant perioperative hypothermia 2014 : Retrospective analysis of 7786 patients].

BACKGROUND: Inadvertent perioperative hypothermia, which is defined as a core body temperature of less than 36.0 °C, can have serious consequences in surgery patients. These include cardiac complications, increased blood loss, wound infections and postoperative shivering; therefore, the scientific evidence that inadvertent perioperative hypothermia should be avoided is undisputed and several national guidelines have been published summarizing the scientific evidence and recommending specific procedures. The German AWMF guidelines were the first to emphasize the importance of prewarming for surgery patients to avoid inadvertant perioperative hypothermia; however, in contrast to intraoperative warming, prewarming is so far not sufficiently implemented in clinical practice in many hospitals. Furthermore, a recent study has questioned the effectiveness of prewarming.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this retrospective investigation was to evaluate the hypothermia rates that can be achieved when prewarming in the anesthesia induction room is introduced into the clinical practice and performed in addition to intraoperative warming.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: The ethics committee of the Medical Faculty of the Martin Luther University Halle Wittenberg gave approval for data storage and retrospective data analysis from the anesthesia database. According to the existing local standard operating procedure, prewarming with forced air was performed in addition to intraoperative warming in the anesthesia induction room in 3899 patients receiving general anesthesia with a duration of 30 min or longer from January 2015 to December 2016. The results were compared with a control group of 3887 patients from July 2012 to August 2014 who received intraoperative warming but were not subjected to prewarming. Tracheal intubation was carried out in all patients and temperature measurements after the induction of anesthesia were performed using esophageal, urinary catheter or intra-arterial temperature probes.

RESULTS: The mean duration of prewarming was 25 min in the treatment group. Patients subjected to prewarming showed an intraoperative hypothermia rate of 15.8% and a postoperative hypothermia rate of 5.1%. Patients without prewarming showed an intraoperative hypothermia rate of 30.4% and a postoperative hypothermia rate of 12.4%. This means a 52% reduction of the intraoperative hypothermia rate and a 41% reduction of the postoperative hypothermia rate for patients who received prewarmimg (p < 0.0001). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that the lack of prewarming was independently associated with intraoperative hypothermia with an odds ratio of 2.5 (95% confidence interval CI 2.250-2.841; p < 0.0001) and postoperative hypothermia with an odds ratio of 2.8 (95% CI 2.316-3.277; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION: Prewarming, as recommended in the AWMF guidelines, resulted in a significant and clinically relevant reduction in the incidence of inadvertent perioperative hypothermia; therefore, prewarming can still be regarded as an effective method to avoid perioperative hypothermia. Hypothermia rates of 15.8% intraoperatively and 5.1% postoperatively can be achieved in clinical practice, when prewarming is performed in addition to intraoperative warming in the anesthesia induction room directly before the start of surgical procedures.