We have located links that may give you full text access.
Particle Filter-Based Target Tracking Algorithm for Magnetic Resonance-Guided Respiratory Compensation: Robustness and Accuracy Assessment.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics 2018 Februrary 2
PURPOSE: To assess overall robustness and accuracy of a modified particle filter-based tracking algorithm for magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiation therapy treatments.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: An improved particle filter-based tracking algorithm was implemented, which used a normalized cross-correlation function as the likelihood calculation. With a total of 5 healthy volunteers and 8 patients, the robustness of the algorithm was tested on 24 dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) time series with varying resolution, contrast, and signal-to-noise ratio. The complete data set included data acquired with different scan parameters on a number of MRI scanners with varying field strengths, including the 1.5T MR linear accelerator. Tracking errors were computed by comparing the results obtained by the particle filter algorithm with experts' delineations.
RESULTS: The ameliorated tracking algorithm was able to accurately track abdominal as well as thoracic tumors, whereas the previous Bhattacharyya distance-based implementation failed in more than 50% of the cases. The tracking error, combined over all MRI acquisitions, is 1.1 ± 0.4 mm, which demonstrated high robustness against variations in contrast, noise, and image resolution. Finally, the effect of the input/control parameters of the model was very similar across all cases, suggesting a class-based optimization is possible.
CONCLUSIONS: The modified particle filter tracking algorithm is highly accurate and robust against varying image quality. This makes the algorithm a promising candidate for automated tracking on the MR linear accelerator.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: An improved particle filter-based tracking algorithm was implemented, which used a normalized cross-correlation function as the likelihood calculation. With a total of 5 healthy volunteers and 8 patients, the robustness of the algorithm was tested on 24 dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) time series with varying resolution, contrast, and signal-to-noise ratio. The complete data set included data acquired with different scan parameters on a number of MRI scanners with varying field strengths, including the 1.5T MR linear accelerator. Tracking errors were computed by comparing the results obtained by the particle filter algorithm with experts' delineations.
RESULTS: The ameliorated tracking algorithm was able to accurately track abdominal as well as thoracic tumors, whereas the previous Bhattacharyya distance-based implementation failed in more than 50% of the cases. The tracking error, combined over all MRI acquisitions, is 1.1 ± 0.4 mm, which demonstrated high robustness against variations in contrast, noise, and image resolution. Finally, the effect of the input/control parameters of the model was very similar across all cases, suggesting a class-based optimization is possible.
CONCLUSIONS: The modified particle filter tracking algorithm is highly accurate and robust against varying image quality. This makes the algorithm a promising candidate for automated tracking on the MR linear accelerator.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app