Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Accuracy of the cobas EGFR Mutation Assay in Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Compared With Three Laboratory-developed Tests.

BACKGROUND: The reliability of the cobas EGFR assay to detect epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as an in vitro diagnostic test was compared with 3 laboratory-developed tests (LDTs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: After screening for EGFR mutations using formalin-fixed-paraffin-embedded NSCLC tissue sections using the cobas EGFR assay, 151 samples were further tested with 3 LDTs; the peptide nucleic acid-locked nucleic acid polymerase chain reaction (PCR) clamp, PCR invader, and Cycleave assays. The cobas EGFR assay performance was evaluated by determining the concordance rate and κ-coefficient between the assays. In samples exhibiting discrepancies in the EGFR mutation status in the 4 assays, next-generation sequencing was performed to confirm mutated sequences.

RESULTS: Concordance rates and κ-coefficients between the cobas EGFR assay and the other tests were 96.0% and 0.921 for the peptide nucleic acid-locked nucleic acid PCR clamp assay, 94.0% and 0.881 for the PCR invader assay, and 96.7% and 0.934 for the Cycleave assay, respectively. Data showed very good agreement with the other assays. Precise mutated sequences or exons in the EGFR gene matched in 137 samples (90.7%). Different results were obtained in 4 samples (2.6%), owing to systemic limitations of the assay. Next-generation sequencing of 10 (6.6%) samples with discordant results exhibited a concordance rate of 60% to 80% in each assay.

CONCLUSIONS: The cobas EGFR assay showed high concordance rates and κ-coefficients between the 3 compared LDTs and can be used to select patients who would benefit from EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app