Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[Evaluation of the psychological feature and quality of life in outpatients with somatic symptoms disorder in a general hospital].

Objective: To explore the psychological features and quality of life in outpatients with somatic symptoms disorder in a general hospital. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from 2014-05 to 2015-06. Patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD) and somatic symptoms disorder (SSD) were recruited from psychological outpatient department, and patients with peptic ulcer (PU) / reflux esophagitis (RE) were recruited from Gastroenterology. Depression scale of the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7), Toronto Alexithymia scale (TAS), 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), items from Somatoform Disorder Screening Questionnaire were employed to evaluate the severity of depression, anxiety, alexithymia, quality of life, health care use and subjective feelings. Results: Scores of PHQ-9 (10±6), GAD-7 (8±5), TAS (74±7) in patients with SSD were significantly higher than PU/RE patients (5±4, 5±4, 71±8, respectively), and the physical component summary (PCS) (40±8) and mental component summary (MCS) (37±10) of SSD patients were much lower than PU/RE (PCS 45±6, MCS 47±9) ( P <0.01). No significant difference was found in the scores of PHQ-9, GAD-7, MCS-12, TAS between SSD and MDD group, but PCS-12 score of SSD group was much lower than that of MDD ( P =0.017). Patients of SSD had more visits, more impact on life and longer duration of disorder. Multiple linear regression found that PHQ-9 score, subject feeling that life quality was affected were significant influential factors of PCS ( F =14.600, P =0.001), and PHQ-9 score, occupation and ability to distinct emotion and physical feelings were significant influential factors of MCS ( F =28.022, P =0.001). Conclusions: The SSD patients in a general hospital suffer from somatic symptoms and emotional distress, and quality of life is affected significantly. Clinicians should thoroughly evaluate patients according to bio-psycho-social aspects and give intervention individually.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app