Gender, power and leadership: the effect of a superior's gender on respiratory therapists' ability to challenge leadership during a life-threatening emergency.

Background: Effective communication within teams is crucial, especially in crisis situations. Hierarchy gradients between team members can contribute to communication failures and are influenced by many factors. The effect of gender on team performance has not been well studied. The objective of this study was to examine the effect of the physician's gender on respiratory therapists' ability to effectively challenge clearly incorrect clinical decisions during a life-threatening crisis.

Methods: Respiratory therapists were recruited to take part in a high-fidelity simulation of can't-intubate can't-oxygenate scenarios. They were randomized into two groups, either assisting a male or a female anaesthetist in managing an airway crisis during which the anaesthetist made incorrect clinical decisions. Two independent raters scored the performances using the modified Advocacy-Inquiry Score (min 1, max 6).

Results: Twenty-nine subjects completed the study. The median best challenge score when the staff anaesthetist was female was 4 (3-5 IQR [2-6 range]) compared with 3 (3-3[0-3]) for challenges to a male anaesthetist (P=0.017). The median of the total challenges against a female staff member 11 (7.3-14.8 [2-18]) was significantly higher compared with 4 (3.5-7 [2-11.5]) for a male staff (P=0.006).

Conclusions: The study showed a significant effect of superiors' gender on a respiratory therapist's ability to challenge leadership. A female staff anaesthetist was challenged more often and with greater assertiveness and effectiveness. This has implications for an educational intervention targeting the ability to challenge a wrong decision by a supervisor and emphasizing the effect of gender on the willingness to speak up.