We have located links that may give you full text access.
Renal transplant outcomes in primary FSGS compared with other recipients and risk factors for recurrence: A national review of the Irish Transplant Registry.
Clinical Transplantation 2018 January
INTRODUCTION: Primary focal segmental glomerular sclerosis (p-FSGS) is commonly complicated by recurrence (r-FSGS) post-transplantation. Our objective was to describe Irish outcomes for transplantation after end-stage renal disease (ESRD) due to p-FSGS, specifically rates of, and treatments for, r-FSGS.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Irish patients with biopsy-proven FSGS were identified from the Irish National Kidney Transplant database (1982-2015). Medical record review was performed to identify predictors of r-FSGS and treatments for r-FSGS. Transplant outcomes were compared to outcomes in all renal transplants performed during the same time period using registry data. Demographic and clinical predictors of r-FSGS were identified. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata (version 13, College Station, TX, USA).
RESULTS: Thirty-eight transplant recipients had biopsy-proven p-FSGS, 16 received a second transplant. A total of 3846 transplants formed the comparator group. r-FSGS complicated 60.5% (23/38) of first transplants. Eighty-six percent (10/12) of patients with previous r-FSGS developed recurrent disease after further transplantation. Patients with p-FSGS receiving a first renal transplant had higher rate of graft failure than those with another cause of ESRD (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.152-3.139). Sixteen patients received immunotherapy for r-FSGS; 12 (86%) had at least partial response, but two (14%) developed significant complications.
DISCUSSION: We demonstrate high rates of r-FSGS and describe modest success from with treatments for r-FSGS.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Irish patients with biopsy-proven FSGS were identified from the Irish National Kidney Transplant database (1982-2015). Medical record review was performed to identify predictors of r-FSGS and treatments for r-FSGS. Transplant outcomes were compared to outcomes in all renal transplants performed during the same time period using registry data. Demographic and clinical predictors of r-FSGS were identified. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata (version 13, College Station, TX, USA).
RESULTS: Thirty-eight transplant recipients had biopsy-proven p-FSGS, 16 received a second transplant. A total of 3846 transplants formed the comparator group. r-FSGS complicated 60.5% (23/38) of first transplants. Eighty-six percent (10/12) of patients with previous r-FSGS developed recurrent disease after further transplantation. Patients with p-FSGS receiving a first renal transplant had higher rate of graft failure than those with another cause of ESRD (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.152-3.139). Sixteen patients received immunotherapy for r-FSGS; 12 (86%) had at least partial response, but two (14%) developed significant complications.
DISCUSSION: We demonstrate high rates of r-FSGS and describe modest success from with treatments for r-FSGS.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app