We have located links that may give you full text access.
Renal transplant outcomes in primary FSGS compared with other recipients and risk factors for recurrence: A national review of the Irish Transplant Registry.
Clinical Transplantation 2018 January
INTRODUCTION: Primary focal segmental glomerular sclerosis (p-FSGS) is commonly complicated by recurrence (r-FSGS) post-transplantation. Our objective was to describe Irish outcomes for transplantation after end-stage renal disease (ESRD) due to p-FSGS, specifically rates of, and treatments for, r-FSGS.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Irish patients with biopsy-proven FSGS were identified from the Irish National Kidney Transplant database (1982-2015). Medical record review was performed to identify predictors of r-FSGS and treatments for r-FSGS. Transplant outcomes were compared to outcomes in all renal transplants performed during the same time period using registry data. Demographic and clinical predictors of r-FSGS were identified. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata (version 13, College Station, TX, USA).
RESULTS: Thirty-eight transplant recipients had biopsy-proven p-FSGS, 16 received a second transplant. A total of 3846 transplants formed the comparator group. r-FSGS complicated 60.5% (23/38) of first transplants. Eighty-six percent (10/12) of patients with previous r-FSGS developed recurrent disease after further transplantation. Patients with p-FSGS receiving a first renal transplant had higher rate of graft failure than those with another cause of ESRD (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.152-3.139). Sixteen patients received immunotherapy for r-FSGS; 12 (86%) had at least partial response, but two (14%) developed significant complications.
DISCUSSION: We demonstrate high rates of r-FSGS and describe modest success from with treatments for r-FSGS.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Irish patients with biopsy-proven FSGS were identified from the Irish National Kidney Transplant database (1982-2015). Medical record review was performed to identify predictors of r-FSGS and treatments for r-FSGS. Transplant outcomes were compared to outcomes in all renal transplants performed during the same time period using registry data. Demographic and clinical predictors of r-FSGS were identified. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata (version 13, College Station, TX, USA).
RESULTS: Thirty-eight transplant recipients had biopsy-proven p-FSGS, 16 received a second transplant. A total of 3846 transplants formed the comparator group. r-FSGS complicated 60.5% (23/38) of first transplants. Eighty-six percent (10/12) of patients with previous r-FSGS developed recurrent disease after further transplantation. Patients with p-FSGS receiving a first renal transplant had higher rate of graft failure than those with another cause of ESRD (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.152-3.139). Sixteen patients received immunotherapy for r-FSGS; 12 (86%) had at least partial response, but two (14%) developed significant complications.
DISCUSSION: We demonstrate high rates of r-FSGS and describe modest success from with treatments for r-FSGS.
Full text links
Trending Papers
Acute and non-acute decompensation of liver cirrhosis (47/130).Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver 2024 March 2
Guide to Utilization of the Microbiology Laboratory for Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases: 2024 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the American Society for Microbiology (ASM).Clinical Infectious Diseases 2024 March 6
Status epilepticus: what's new for the intensivist.Current Opinion in Critical Care 2024 Februrary 15
Administration of methylene blue in septic shock: pros and cons.Critical Care : the Official Journal of the Critical Care Forum 2024 Februrary 17
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app