Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

First Metatarsal Head Osteochondral Defect Treatment With Particulated Juvenile Cartilage Allograft Transplantation: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Focal damage to articular cartilage, also called an osteochondral defect (OCD), can be a cause of pain and decreased range of motion. Recent advancements have led to transplantation techniques using particulated juvenile articular cartilage allograft. This technique has been applied to the first metatarsal head to a very limited degree, with no published results to our knowledge. The aim of this study was to review the clinical results of patients who underwent particulated juvenile cartilage allograft implantation for first metatarsal head OCDs.

METHODS: We performed a retrospective consecutive case series study. Nine patients, at an average age of 41 years, were treated for symptomatic focal osteochondral defects of the first metatarsal head with particulate cartilage grafting from 2010 to 2016. Patients were contacted by phone to assess interest in returning to the office for follow-up, where weightbearing radiographs of the foot were obtained and a foot examination was performed.

RESULTS: At an average follow-up of 3.3 years, 7 of 9 patients reported no pain with recreational activities and no patient required further operations. This patient cohort was physically active, with 6 of 9 listing running as a regular activity. The average overall American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Hallux Metatarsophalangeal-Interphalangeal Scale questionnaire score was 85 (maximum 100), AOFAS pain 35.6 (maximum 40), and AOFAS function 40.1 (maximum 45). Patient satisfaction surveys correlated with the AOFAS scores and revealed that 7 of 9 patients were very satisfied with their results, 1 was satisfied, and 1 patient was very dissatisfied.

CONCLUSION: Particulated juvenile cartilage allograft transplantation is a promising treatment option for symptomatic first metatarsophalangeal focal articular cartilage lesions. Further study is needed to demonstrate which lesions respond better to this type of cartilage graft versus traditional marrow-stimulating procedures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app