We have located links that may give you full text access.
Evaluation Studies
Journal Article
18 F-FDG PET/contrast enhanced CT in the standard follow-up of patients with lymphoma.
AIM: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of 18 F-FDG PET/contrast enhanced computed tomography (ceCT) in the detection of asymptomatic recurrences in patients with lymphoma.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with lymphoma and clinical complete remission underwent 18 F-FDG PET/ceCT for standard follow-up.18 F-FDG PET and ceCT were evaluated blindly by two independent observers, and classified as positive or negative for recurrence. Additionally a combined evaluation of both techniques was performed. The final diagnosis was established by histopathological analysis or a clinical follow-up longer than 6 months. Statistical diagnostic parameters and concordance levels between both diagnostic techniques were calculated.
RESULTS: A total of 114 explorations on 90 patients were analyzed. Only 4 patients were diagnosed as asymptomatic recurrence during the follow-up. 18 F-FDG PET/ceCT, 18 F-FDG PET and ceCT showed an association with the final diagnosis (p=0.002 and χ2 =11.96; p<0.001 and χ2 =15.60; p=0.001 and χ2 =11.96, respectively). The concordance between 18 F-FDG PET and ceCT was moderate/high and significant (kappa=0.672; p<0.001). A sensitivity and specificity of 50% and 88% was obtained for the 18 F-FDG PET/ceCT civ, 50% and 93% for the 18 F-FDG PET, and 50% and 91% for the ceCT.
CONCLUSION: The combined use of 18 F-FDG PET/ceCT did not offer any advantage compared to any isolated diagnostic technique in the detection of asymptomatic lymphoma recurrence.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with lymphoma and clinical complete remission underwent 18 F-FDG PET/ceCT for standard follow-up.18 F-FDG PET and ceCT were evaluated blindly by two independent observers, and classified as positive or negative for recurrence. Additionally a combined evaluation of both techniques was performed. The final diagnosis was established by histopathological analysis or a clinical follow-up longer than 6 months. Statistical diagnostic parameters and concordance levels between both diagnostic techniques were calculated.
RESULTS: A total of 114 explorations on 90 patients were analyzed. Only 4 patients were diagnosed as asymptomatic recurrence during the follow-up. 18 F-FDG PET/ceCT, 18 F-FDG PET and ceCT showed an association with the final diagnosis (p=0.002 and χ2 =11.96; p<0.001 and χ2 =15.60; p=0.001 and χ2 =11.96, respectively). The concordance between 18 F-FDG PET and ceCT was moderate/high and significant (kappa=0.672; p<0.001). A sensitivity and specificity of 50% and 88% was obtained for the 18 F-FDG PET/ceCT civ, 50% and 93% for the 18 F-FDG PET, and 50% and 91% for the ceCT.
CONCLUSION: The combined use of 18 F-FDG PET/ceCT did not offer any advantage compared to any isolated diagnostic technique in the detection of asymptomatic lymphoma recurrence.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app