Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

The impact of spontaneous ventilation on non-operative lung injury in thoracic surgery: a randomized controlled rabbit model study.

OBJECTIVES: One-lung ventilation (OLV) with general anaesthesia may increase adverse effects after thoracic surgery, specifically ventilator-induced lung injury. Spontaneous ventilation (SV) has no mechanical ventilation process, thus, we established a rabbit model to assess non-operative lung injury between OLV and SV.

METHODS: Thirty-six rabbits were randomly divided into 6 groups: OLV and SV (0, 2 and 4 h). Blood gas analysis was performed after thoracic surgery. Lung tissue and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid were obtained from the non-operative lung. Pathological injury score in lung tissue and tumour necrosis factor α (TNF-α) level in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were determined. Moreover, messenger RNA and protein of TNF-α in lung tissue were also determined by quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS: Compared with the OLV group, significantly higher partial pressure of carbon dioxide (47.78 ± 3.57 vs 38.95 ± 3.88 mmHg, P < 0.01) and partial pressure of oxygen (101.08 ± 13.1 vs 85.6 ± 11.07 mmHg, P < 0.01), as well as a significantly lower pathological injury score (6.83 ± 1.17 vs 8.83 ± 1.72, P < 0.05), TNF-α level in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (290.32 ± 29.38 vs 368.43 ± 31.26 pg/ml, P < 0.01), TNF-α messenger RNA (6.31 ± 1.13 vs 8.6 ± 1.34, P < 0.01), immunostaining intensity in lung tissue were found at 4 h in the SV group. However, there are no significant differences between OLV and SV groups at 2 h (P > 0.05), except in TNF-α messenger RNA.

CONCLUSIONS: Based on this rabbit model, SV for thoracic surgery is not inferior to OLV in terms of lung injury. Considering our results, when performing time-consuming thoracic procedures under OLV, surgeons should more closely examine patients for non-operative lung injury postoperatively.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app