COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparison of microtomography and optical coherence tomography on apical endodontic filling analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To comparein vitro differences in the apical filling regarding working length (WL) change and presence of voids and to validate optical coherence tomography (OCT) in comparison with computerized microtomography (µCT) for the detection of failures in the apical filling.

METHODS: Forty-five uniradicular teeth with round canals, divided into groups (n = 15) following the obturation protocols: LC (lateral condensation), TMC (thermomechanical compaction) and SC (single cone). Samples were scanned using µCT (parameters: 80 kV, 222 µA, and resolution of 11 µm), OCT (parameters: SSOCT, 1300 nm and axial resolution of 12 µm), and periapical digital radiography. The images were analyzsed by two blind and calibrated observers using ImageJ software to measure the boundary of the obturation WL and voids presence. Categorical and metric data were submitted to inferential analysis, and the validity of the OCT as a diagnostic test was assessed with performance and reliability tests.

RESULTS: The WL average remained constant for all obturation techniques and image methods. OCT showed adequate sensitivity and specificity to detect voids in the WL of apical obturations in vitro in comparison with µCT. Both image methods found a higher number of voids for LC technique (µCT p = 0.011/OCT p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS: OCT can be used in apical obturation voids assessment and the LC technique revealed more voids with larger dimensions.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app