Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Improving negative liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization mass spectrometry lipidomic analysis of human plasma using acetic acid as a mobile-phase additive.

RATIONALE: Mobile-phase additives in liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) are used to improve peak shape, analyte ionization efficiency and method coverage. Both basic and acidic mobile phases have been used successfully for negative electrospray ionization (ESI), but very few systematic investigations exist to date to justify the choice of mobile phase. Acetic acid was previously shown to improve ionization in untargeted metabolomics of urine, but has not been investigated in lipidomics. The goal of this study was to systematically compare the performance of acetic acid to that of other commonly employed additives in negative LC/ESI-MS lipidomics.

METHODS: The performance of acetic acid was compared to that of commonly used mobile-phase additives in lipidomics, namely ammonium acetate, ammonium acetate with acetic acid and ammonium hydroxide, using lipid standard solutions containing representatives of major mammalian lipid subclasses and isopropanol-precipitated human plasma. This design allowed comparison of the influence of additive and additive concentration on lipid signal intensity, lipid peak shape and lipid coverage in both simple and complex biological matrices using both Orbitrap and quadrupole time-of-flight MS platforms with different ESI source designs.

RESULTS: Ammonium hydroxide caused 2- to 1000-fold signal suppression of all lipid classes in comparison to acetic acid. In comparison to ammonium acetate, acetic acid increased lipid signal intensity from 2- to 19-fold for 11 lipid subclasses, and decreased ionization efficiency only for ceramide and phosphatidylcholine lipid classes which can be effectively ionized in positive ESI mode. The improved ionization efficiency using acetic acid also increased lipid coverage by 21-50% versus ammonium acetate additive.

CONCLUSIONS: Acetic acid at a concentration of 0.02% (v/v) is the suggested choice as a mobile-phase additive for lipidomics and targeted lipid profiling with negative LC/ESI-MS based on signal enhancement and improved lipid coverage compared to ammonium acetate, ammonium acetate with acetic acid and ammonium hydroxide mobile phases.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app