We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Automated event detection algorithm for two squatting protocols.
Gait & Posture 2018 January
INTRODUCTION: Squatting biomechanics assessed using motion analysis relies on the identification of specific events: start of descent, transition between descent/ascent and end of ascent. Automated identification reduces the time needed to process trials while allowing consistency across studies. The purpose of this study was to develop criteria for the identification of events and apply them to two squatting protocols in pathological patient and typically developing (TD) groups.
METHODS: Thirty-four subjects with hip dysplasia and 41 TD subjects were enrolled in this study. While instrumented with a full-body Plug-In-Gait marker set, participants performed two squatting protocols: a hold squat, where subjects paused for a count of three at their lowest squat depth, and a traditional squat, where the descent phase was immediately followed by the ascent phase. Reviewers analyzed the kinematic/kinetic waveforms of a subset of trials to develop criteria for events. Sagittal plane knee and vertical center of mass velocities were used to identify events and absolute vs. relative thresholds of the peak knee velocity were compared. These criteria were incorporated into an automatic event detection code.
RESULTS: Using a relative threshold algorithm, events were automatically identified in 244 of 259 total trials (94%). For the trials requiring manual placement of events (n=15 trials), there was perfect inter-rater reliability between research personnel.
CONCLUSIONS: The criteria developed for the automatic detection of squatting events was highly successful for both protocols in each participant group and was also highly reliable for research personnel to follow in the few instances where manual placement was necessary.
METHODS: Thirty-four subjects with hip dysplasia and 41 TD subjects were enrolled in this study. While instrumented with a full-body Plug-In-Gait marker set, participants performed two squatting protocols: a hold squat, where subjects paused for a count of three at their lowest squat depth, and a traditional squat, where the descent phase was immediately followed by the ascent phase. Reviewers analyzed the kinematic/kinetic waveforms of a subset of trials to develop criteria for events. Sagittal plane knee and vertical center of mass velocities were used to identify events and absolute vs. relative thresholds of the peak knee velocity were compared. These criteria were incorporated into an automatic event detection code.
RESULTS: Using a relative threshold algorithm, events were automatically identified in 244 of 259 total trials (94%). For the trials requiring manual placement of events (n=15 trials), there was perfect inter-rater reliability between research personnel.
CONCLUSIONS: The criteria developed for the automatic detection of squatting events was highly successful for both protocols in each participant group and was also highly reliable for research personnel to follow in the few instances where manual placement was necessary.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app