We have located links that may give you full text access.
An iterative sinogram gap-filling method with object- and scanner-dedicated discrete cosine transform (DCT)-domain filters for high resolution PET scanners.
Japanese Journal of Radiology 2018 January
PURPOSE: We aimed to develop a gap-filling algorithm, in particular the filter mask design method of the algorithm, which optimizes the filter to the imaging object by an adaptive and iterative process, rather than by manual means.
METHODS: Two numerical phantoms (Shepp-Logan and Jaszczak) were used for sinogram generation. The algorithm works iteratively, not only on the gap-filling iteration but also on the mask generation, to identify the object-dedicated low frequency area in the DCT-domain that is to be preserved. We redefine the low frequency preserving region of the filter mask at every gap-filling iteration, and the region verges on the property of the original image in the DCT domain.
RESULTS: The previous DCT2 mask for each phantom case had been manually well optimized, and the results show little difference from the reference image and sinogram. We observed little or no difference between the results of the manually optimized DCT2 algorithm and those of the proposed algorithm.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed algorithm works well for various types of scanning object and shows results that compare to those of the manually optimized DCT2 algorithm without perfect or full information of the imaging object.
METHODS: Two numerical phantoms (Shepp-Logan and Jaszczak) were used for sinogram generation. The algorithm works iteratively, not only on the gap-filling iteration but also on the mask generation, to identify the object-dedicated low frequency area in the DCT-domain that is to be preserved. We redefine the low frequency preserving region of the filter mask at every gap-filling iteration, and the region verges on the property of the original image in the DCT domain.
RESULTS: The previous DCT2 mask for each phantom case had been manually well optimized, and the results show little difference from the reference image and sinogram. We observed little or no difference between the results of the manually optimized DCT2 algorithm and those of the proposed algorithm.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed algorithm works well for various types of scanning object and shows results that compare to those of the manually optimized DCT2 algorithm without perfect or full information of the imaging object.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app