We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Treatment for Localized T1a Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Survival Benefit for Cryosurgery and Thermal Ablation Compared to Deferred Therapy.
Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology 2018 Februrary
PURPOSE: To evaluate survival of patients with localized T1a clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) who received cryosurgery or thermal ablation compared to deferred therapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 733 patients with histopathologically confirmed localized T1a ccRCC who either received cryosurgery (n = 315) or thermal ablation (n = 155), as well as patients who deferred therapy (n = 263) from the 2000-2013 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program urinary cancer file. Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare cancer-specific survival (CSS) across subgroups. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess potential unmeasured confounding by comorbidities.
RESULTS: Patients treated with cryosurgery and thermal ablation had a statistically significant CSS benefit compared to those who deferred therapy (cryosurgery HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.14-0.45, p < 0.001; thermal ablation HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.13-0.55, p < 0.001, after adjustment for age at diagnosis, tumor grade, and size). There was no significant difference in CSS comparing cryosurgery to thermal ablation (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.45-2.3, p = 0.95, after adjustment for age at diagnosis, tumor grade, and size). These results proved robust upon sensitivity analyses: After adjustment for comorbidities with varying prevalence assumptions, the corrected hazard ratio (cHR) of cryosurgery versus deferred therapy ranged between HR 0.09 and 0.68.
CONCLUSION: Local ablative techniques provide relevant survival benefit and are preferable alternatives over deferred therapy. Cryosurgery and thermal ablation yield comparable outcomes.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b according to the Oxford Centre for evidence-based medicine levels of evidence.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 733 patients with histopathologically confirmed localized T1a ccRCC who either received cryosurgery (n = 315) or thermal ablation (n = 155), as well as patients who deferred therapy (n = 263) from the 2000-2013 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program urinary cancer file. Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare cancer-specific survival (CSS) across subgroups. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess potential unmeasured confounding by comorbidities.
RESULTS: Patients treated with cryosurgery and thermal ablation had a statistically significant CSS benefit compared to those who deferred therapy (cryosurgery HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.14-0.45, p < 0.001; thermal ablation HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.13-0.55, p < 0.001, after adjustment for age at diagnosis, tumor grade, and size). There was no significant difference in CSS comparing cryosurgery to thermal ablation (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.45-2.3, p = 0.95, after adjustment for age at diagnosis, tumor grade, and size). These results proved robust upon sensitivity analyses: After adjustment for comorbidities with varying prevalence assumptions, the corrected hazard ratio (cHR) of cryosurgery versus deferred therapy ranged between HR 0.09 and 0.68.
CONCLUSION: Local ablative techniques provide relevant survival benefit and are preferable alternatives over deferred therapy. Cryosurgery and thermal ablation yield comparable outcomes.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b according to the Oxford Centre for evidence-based medicine levels of evidence.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app