Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

In sickness and in health, till death do us part: Is the ICD a lifelong commitment?

The decision-making process around initial implantation of an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) is well studied, guided by randomized clinical trials which have translated into widely accepted clinical guidelines. For patients who out-live their first device and are eligible for a generator exchange (GE) the indications to replace the battery is much less well-defined. In this latter case, the clinician needs to make the decision based on persistent indications for primary prevention ICD, risk of future arrhythmic death in the absence of ongoing indications for primary prevention, competing causes of non-arrhythmic death and the patient's overall goals of care.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app