We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Utility of preoperative Holter monitoring in children undergoing extracardiac conduit Fontan operation.
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology : PACE 2017 December
BACKGROUND: In patients undergoing extracardiac conduit Fontan (ECF) who require postoperative pacing, epicardial leads are usually required because of anatomical constraints. If indicated, these could be conveniently placed at the time of ECF. We have routinely performed ambulatory 24-hour Holter monitoring before ECF to determine the presence or absence of preoperative sinus node dysfunction, in an attempt to avoid repeat sternotomy at a later time.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of all patients undergoing ECF from January 2000 to December 2015.
RESULTS: Two hundred sixteen patients met inclusion criteria. Patients were separated into two groups, those with preoperative Holter monitoring (PHM, n = 150) and those without (No-PHM, n = 66). Ten patients (4.6%) underwent permanent pacemaker implantation at the time of ECF (eight patients [5.3%] in PHM vs two patients [3.0%] in No-PHM, P = 0.46). There were seven (3.2%) patients who underwent pacemaker implantation after ECF requiring repeat sternotomy (four patients [2.7%] in PHM vs three patients [4.5%] in No-PHM, P = 0.47). Fourteen (6.5%) patients underwent permanent epicardial lead placement without a pulse generator at the time of ECF. None from this group underwent pacemaker implantation to date (median follow-up of 5.7 years). The overall incidence of pacemaker implantation was 9.3% (20 patients).
CONCLUSIONS: In our series, arrhythmia disturbances requiring pacing after ECF occurred in just over 9% of patients. While PHM in those patients may help predict which patients might require postoperative pacing, this approach did not result in a significant decrease in those patients requiring repeat sternotomy for pacemaker implantation.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of all patients undergoing ECF from January 2000 to December 2015.
RESULTS: Two hundred sixteen patients met inclusion criteria. Patients were separated into two groups, those with preoperative Holter monitoring (PHM, n = 150) and those without (No-PHM, n = 66). Ten patients (4.6%) underwent permanent pacemaker implantation at the time of ECF (eight patients [5.3%] in PHM vs two patients [3.0%] in No-PHM, P = 0.46). There were seven (3.2%) patients who underwent pacemaker implantation after ECF requiring repeat sternotomy (four patients [2.7%] in PHM vs three patients [4.5%] in No-PHM, P = 0.47). Fourteen (6.5%) patients underwent permanent epicardial lead placement without a pulse generator at the time of ECF. None from this group underwent pacemaker implantation to date (median follow-up of 5.7 years). The overall incidence of pacemaker implantation was 9.3% (20 patients).
CONCLUSIONS: In our series, arrhythmia disturbances requiring pacing after ECF occurred in just over 9% of patients. While PHM in those patients may help predict which patients might require postoperative pacing, this approach did not result in a significant decrease in those patients requiring repeat sternotomy for pacemaker implantation.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app