We have located links that may give you full text access.
Increased severity of liver fat content and liver fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease correlate with epicardial fat volume in type 2 diabetes: A prospective study.
European Radiology 2018 April
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether severity of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and liver fibrosis quantitatively assessed in individuals with diabetes mellitus (DM)-2 correlate with increased coronary heart disease (CHD) risk using non-invasive markers.
METHODS: We conducted a single-centre, prospective, cross-sectional study in 100 consecutive diabetic individuals without known CHD recruited between March 2013 and September 2014. History, physical examination, serum markers, cardiac computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-estimated proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and MR elastography (MRE) were obtained for 95 participants. Written informed consent was provided. Institutional review board approved this study. Spearman rank correlation was performed to assess for correlations. Multiple linear regression model determined independent predictors of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) volume.
RESULTS: A p value < 0.05 determined statistical significance. The EAT volume was higher in the NAFLD group, defined as MR-imaging PDFF ≥ 5 %, compared to the non-NAFLD group (126.5 ml (IQR 80.9) versus 85.4 ml (IQR 44.7), p=0.002). MR imaging-PDFF correlated with EAT (r=0.42, p < 0.0001). MR imaging-PDFF and liver fibrosis were independently associated with EAT.
CONCLUSIONS: Higher liver fat content and liver fibrosis may portend worse cardiovascular risk in diabetics.
KEY POINTS: • EAT volume is higher in diabetic individuals with NAFLD. • Liver fat content is positively correlated with EAT. • Liver fat content and liver fibrosis were independently associated with EAT. • Higher liver fat content and fibrosis may adversely affect cardiovascular risk.
METHODS: We conducted a single-centre, prospective, cross-sectional study in 100 consecutive diabetic individuals without known CHD recruited between March 2013 and September 2014. History, physical examination, serum markers, cardiac computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-estimated proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and MR elastography (MRE) were obtained for 95 participants. Written informed consent was provided. Institutional review board approved this study. Spearman rank correlation was performed to assess for correlations. Multiple linear regression model determined independent predictors of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) volume.
RESULTS: A p value < 0.05 determined statistical significance. The EAT volume was higher in the NAFLD group, defined as MR-imaging PDFF ≥ 5 %, compared to the non-NAFLD group (126.5 ml (IQR 80.9) versus 85.4 ml (IQR 44.7), p=0.002). MR imaging-PDFF correlated with EAT (r=0.42, p < 0.0001). MR imaging-PDFF and liver fibrosis were independently associated with EAT.
CONCLUSIONS: Higher liver fat content and liver fibrosis may portend worse cardiovascular risk in diabetics.
KEY POINTS: • EAT volume is higher in diabetic individuals with NAFLD. • Liver fat content is positively correlated with EAT. • Liver fat content and liver fibrosis were independently associated with EAT. • Higher liver fat content and fibrosis may adversely affect cardiovascular risk.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app