We have located links that may give you full text access.
Use of 'ideal' alveolar air equations and corrected end-tidal PCO 2 to estimate arterial PCO 2 and physiological dead space during exercise in patients with heart failure.
International Journal of Cardiology 2018 January 2
BACKGROUND: Arterial CO2 tension (PaCO2 ) and physiological dead space (VD ) are not routinely measured during clinical cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Abnormal changes in PaCO2 accompanied by increased VD directly contribute to impaired exercise ventilatory function in heart failure (HF). Because arterial catheterization is not standard practice during CPET, this study tested the construct validity of PaCO2 and VD prediction models using 'ideal' alveolar air equations and basic ventilation and gas-exchangegas exchange measurements during CPET in HF.
METHODS: Forty-seven NYHA class II/III HF (LVEF=21±7%; age=55±9years; male=89%; BMI=28±5kg/m2 ) performed step-wise cycle ergometry CPET to volitional fatigue. Breath-by-breath ventilation and gas exchange were measured continuously. Steady-state PaCO2 was measured at rest and peak exercise via radial arterial catheterization. Criterion VD was calculated via 'ideal' alveolar equations, whereas PaCO2 or VD models were based on end-tidal CO2 tension (PET CO2 ), tidal volume (VT ), and/or weight.
RESULTS: Criterion measurements of PaCO2 (38±5 vs. 33±5mmHg, P<0.01) and VD (0.26±0.07 vs. 0.41±0.15L, P<0.01) differed at rest vs. peak exercise, respectively. The equation, 5.5+0.90×PET CO2 -0.0021×VT , was the strongest predictor of PaCO2 at rest and peak exercise (bias±95%LOA=-3.24±6.63 and -0.98±5.76mmHg; R2 =0.57 and 0.75, P<0.001, respectively). This equation closely predicted VD at rest and peak exercise (bias±95%LOA=-0.03±0.06 and -0.02±0.13L; R2 =0.86 and 0.83, P<0.001, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest predicted PaCO2 and VD based on breath-by-breath gas exchange and ventilatory responses demonstrate acceptable agreement with criterion measurements at peak exercise in HF patients. Routine assessment of PaCO2 and VD can be used to improve interpretability of exercise ventilatory responses in HF.
METHODS: Forty-seven NYHA class II/III HF (LVEF=21±7%; age=55±9years; male=89%; BMI=28±5kg/m2 ) performed step-wise cycle ergometry CPET to volitional fatigue. Breath-by-breath ventilation and gas exchange were measured continuously. Steady-state PaCO2 was measured at rest and peak exercise via radial arterial catheterization. Criterion VD was calculated via 'ideal' alveolar equations, whereas PaCO2 or VD models were based on end-tidal CO2 tension (PET CO2 ), tidal volume (VT ), and/or weight.
RESULTS: Criterion measurements of PaCO2 (38±5 vs. 33±5mmHg, P<0.01) and VD (0.26±0.07 vs. 0.41±0.15L, P<0.01) differed at rest vs. peak exercise, respectively. The equation, 5.5+0.90×PET CO2 -0.0021×VT , was the strongest predictor of PaCO2 at rest and peak exercise (bias±95%LOA=-3.24±6.63 and -0.98±5.76mmHg; R2 =0.57 and 0.75, P<0.001, respectively). This equation closely predicted VD at rest and peak exercise (bias±95%LOA=-0.03±0.06 and -0.02±0.13L; R2 =0.86 and 0.83, P<0.001, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest predicted PaCO2 and VD based on breath-by-breath gas exchange and ventilatory responses demonstrate acceptable agreement with criterion measurements at peak exercise in HF patients. Routine assessment of PaCO2 and VD can be used to improve interpretability of exercise ventilatory responses in HF.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app