Central corneal thickness assessment after phacoemulsification: Subluxation versus Divide-and-Conquer.

PURPOSE: To compare the impact of two phacoemulsification techniques (subluxation versus divide-and-conquer) on postoperative corneal edema at postoperative hour 1 and day 4.

DESIGN: Comparative study.

METHOD: Ninety-six consecutive patients (110 eyes; 43 men and 53 women, mean age 70.9±9.8 years) with equivalent cataract grades underwent cataract surgery and were followed up for 6 months. The presence of corneal edema was determined using central corneal thickness (CCT). CCT was measured preoperatively, and at postoperative hour 1 and day 4.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ultrasound power (US %), duration of ultrasound (TPA), effective ultrasound time (TPE), surgical duration and final suture (%).

RESULTS: Eyes of participants were divided into two phacoemulsification technique groups: subluxation (n=50 eyes) and divide-and-conquer (n=60 eyes). Non-inferiority analysis revealed similar CCT increases at postoperative hour 1 in both groups, with 69.9±44.9μm and 64.4±42.9μm, observed in the subluxation and divide-and-conquer groups, respectively (P=0.033). TPE was similar in both groups, taking 6.2±3.4 and 7.3±4.5seconds in the subluxation and divide-and-conquer groups, respectively (P=0.150). No correlation was seen between TPE and edema at postoperative hour 1, or between TPE and day 4 edema. Rate of final suture use was similar between the subluxation and divide and conquer groups, at 36% and 30%, respectively.

CONCLUSION: The study findings suggest that cataract surgery performed using the subluxation technique does not result in greater CCT than the divide-and-conquer technique. CCT appears to normalize by postoperative day 4, regardless of the technique used.