Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Impact of corneal donor lens status on two-year course and outcome of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to investigate the impact of lens status of corneal donors on the two-year course and clinical outcome of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

METHODS: In 181 DMEK surgeries, 136 phakic and 45 pseudophakic donor corneas were grafted. In this retrospective audit we compared the lens status of corneal donors regarding the outcome measures best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), and endothelial cell density (ECD) at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, as well as intra- and postoperative complication rates and graft detachment rates requiring re-bubbling.

RESULTS: Comparing the use of phakic and pseudophakic donor tissue in DMEK surgery, BSCVA results revealed no significant differences during the two-year course (p ≥ 0.087). CCT showed significantly lower values at 1 month (553.8 ± 56 vs. 625.2 ± 119 μm; p < 0.001) and 6 months follow-up (530.6 ± 49.9 vs. 557.3 ± 47 μm; p = 0.026) for phakic donor tissue recipients, but were comparable later (p ≥ 0.173). ECD values were statistically higher 6 (1915 ± 390 vs. 1565 ± 420 cells/mm2 ; p < 0.001) and 24 months postoperatively (1772 ± 384 vs. 1375 ± 377 cells/mm2 ; p = 0.030) in phakic donor tissue recipients. Mixed regression analyses demonstrated a significant association between ECD results and donor lens status (p = 0.029) and donor ECD (p = 0.028), but donor age did not show significant influence (p = 0.241).

CONCLUSION: ECD is higher in phakic corneal donors and appears to remain at a higher level during the course resulting in initially faster reduction of corneal edema compared to pseudophakic DMEK grafts. Nevertheless, pseudophakic transplants with high ECD seem to produce comparable functional results in recipients after a two year course.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app