Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

First trimester screening for pre-eclampsia in Chinese pregnancies: case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the potential of screening for pre-eclampsia (PE) in a Chinese population.

DESIGN: Case-control study.

SETTING: Teaching hospital in Hong Kong.

POPULATION: A total of 3330 women having a viable singleton pregnancy attending first-trimester Down-syndrome screening.

METHODS: Mean arterial pressure (MAP), bilateral uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI), and placental growth factor (PlGF) were measured. Screening markers were transformed to multiples of the gestational median (MoM) and adjusted for maternal and pregnancy characteristics. MoM distributions in PE and non-PE pregnancies were compared with published expected values. PE screening performance was assessed using area under receiver operating curves (AUROC).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: PE detection rate.

RESULTS: A total of 30 (0.9%) women developed either early (<34 weeks) or late (≥34 weeks) onset PE. MAP was dependent on maternal BMI, UtA-PI on fetal crown rump length, uterine artery peak systolic velocity (UtA-PSV) on maternal age and gestation, and PlGF on gestation in non-PE pregnancies. MoM distributions determined using published Fetal Medicine Foundation models deviated significantly from one for both MAP (P < 0.0001) and PI (P < 0.0001), but not PlGF (P = 0.52) in non-PE pregnancies, whilst PlGF MoM distributions in those who developed early as opposed to late onset PE were significantly higher (P = <0.05). AUROC for any PE using multiple markers was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.64-0.81) with detection rates of 72 and 55% for early and late PE, respectively, for a 10% false positive rate.

CONCLUSION: Detection rates for PE in our Chinese population were lower than the expected 90-95% even after adjusting MoM for local women's characteristics.

FUNDING: General Research Fund (Project number 470513).

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Pre-eclampsia screening in the Chinese population had detection rates lower than previously published results.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app