Woman's Pre-Conception Evaluation: Genetic and Fetal Risk Considerations for Counselling and Informed Choice.

OBJECTIVE: To inform reproductive and other health care providers about genetic and fetal risk information to consider during a woman/couples' pre-conception evaluation, including considerations for genetic risk assessment, genetic screening, or testing to allow for improved counselling and informed choice.

OPTIONS: This genetic information can be used for patient education, planning, and possible pre-conception and/or prenatal testing.

OUTCOMES: This information may allow improved risk assessment for pre-conception counselling for individual patients and their families.

EVIDENCE: PubMed or Medline and the Cochrane Database were searched in May 2017 using appropriate key words ("pre-conception," "genetic disease," "maternal," "family history," "genetic," "health risk," "genetic health surveillance," "prenatal screening," "prenatal diagnosis," "birth defects," and "teratogen"). Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology assessment-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, and national and international medical specialty societies.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: The benefits for the patient and her family include an increased understanding of relevant genetic risk pre-conception and in early pregnancy, and better pregnancy outcomes as a result of use of the information. The harm includes potential increased anxiety or psychological stress associated with the possibility of identifying genetic risks.

VALIDATION: The evidence obtained was peer-reviewed by the Genetics Committee of The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Consideration for Care Statements For this review article, the Consideration for Care Statements use the GRADE strength and quality as it is comparable for the clinician and the patient/public user. [GRADE from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (www.canadiantaskforce.ca). For clinicians, Strong = The recommendation would apply to most individuals. Formal discussion aids are not likely to be needed to help individuals make decisions consistent with their values and preferences. For patients/public, Strong = We believe most people in this situation would want the recommended course of actions and only a small number would not. Quality of evidence (High, Moderate, Low) based on the confidence that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.] Conclusion Pre-conception planning is presently underutilized by both patients and providers. Pre-conception genetic assessment is only a part of the counselling, education, and health management change that can improve perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality. A published literature review on pre-conception genetic counselling identified mainly clinical cohort studies, surveys, and expert opinion with no RCTs. There is strong support for pre-conception counselling and moderate quality based on the understanding that most individuals would support and use pre-conception counselling when choice, timing, and ease of access is considered.