We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Review
Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of FoxM1 in gastric cancer: A meta-analysis.
International Journal of Surgery 2017 December
BACKGROUND: The relationship between expression of FoxM1 and clinical parameters of patients with gastric cancer (GC) has yet to be fully established.
METHODS: A systematic search was performed. Odds ratio (OR) and confidence interval (CI) were used to assess association between expression of FoxM1 and clinical parameters and the prognostic value of patients with GC.
RESULTS: Eight studies involving 529 patients with GC were identified. Overall, the pooled results showed that expression of FoxM1 was associated with TNM stage (OR: 0.482, 95%CI: 0.275-0.845, P = 0.011), depth of invasion (OR: 0.617, 95%CI: 0.382-0.998, P = 0.049) and lymph node metastasis (OR: 2.084, 95%CI: 1.305-3.328, P = 0.002) in the patients with GC. Whereas, expression of FoxM1 was not associated with gender (OR: 1.143, 95%CI: 0.726-1.799, P = 0.564) and tumors' differentiation (OR: 0.991, 95%CI: 0.624-1.575, P = 0.971) of GC. Expression of FoxM1 was also associated with poor prognosis of overall survival (OS) in the patients with GC (one year OS: OR: 0.218, 95%CI: 0.103-0.459, P = 0.000; three years OS: OR: 0.178, 95%CI: 0.093-0.340, P = 0.000; five years OS: OR: 0.180, 95%CI: 0.095-0.341, P = 0.000).
CONCLUSION: Expression of FoxM1 is associated with TNM stage, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis of the patients with GC.
METHODS: A systematic search was performed. Odds ratio (OR) and confidence interval (CI) were used to assess association between expression of FoxM1 and clinical parameters and the prognostic value of patients with GC.
RESULTS: Eight studies involving 529 patients with GC were identified. Overall, the pooled results showed that expression of FoxM1 was associated with TNM stage (OR: 0.482, 95%CI: 0.275-0.845, P = 0.011), depth of invasion (OR: 0.617, 95%CI: 0.382-0.998, P = 0.049) and lymph node metastasis (OR: 2.084, 95%CI: 1.305-3.328, P = 0.002) in the patients with GC. Whereas, expression of FoxM1 was not associated with gender (OR: 1.143, 95%CI: 0.726-1.799, P = 0.564) and tumors' differentiation (OR: 0.991, 95%CI: 0.624-1.575, P = 0.971) of GC. Expression of FoxM1 was also associated with poor prognosis of overall survival (OS) in the patients with GC (one year OS: OR: 0.218, 95%CI: 0.103-0.459, P = 0.000; three years OS: OR: 0.178, 95%CI: 0.093-0.340, P = 0.000; five years OS: OR: 0.180, 95%CI: 0.095-0.341, P = 0.000).
CONCLUSION: Expression of FoxM1 is associated with TNM stage, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis of the patients with GC.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app