We have located links that may give you full text access.
Proposed cut scores for tests of the Brief International Cognitive Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS).
Journal of the Neurological Sciences 2017 October 16
OBJECTIVE: Cognitive impairment (CI) is common in multiple sclerosis (MS). An international consensus committee developed the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS) to screen for CI commonly seen in MS. BICAMS cut scores would allow clinicians to, efficiently and effectively, identify patients with possible CI and could aid in clinical decision-making. The aim of this study was to establish cut scores for the neuropsychological tests of the BICAMS.
METHODS: This study utilized data collected from MS Centers in the United States. ROC curve analysis identified cut scores yielding the best balance of sensitivity and specificity. We tested two definitions of impairment: 1.5 and 2 standard deviations (SD) below the normative mean.
RESULTS: All cut scores yielded excellent or good sensitivity and specificity for identifying impaired cognitive performance. The following cut scores yielded the best balance between sensitivity and specificity: On the Symbol Digit Modalities Test, 44 for 1.5 SD below the mean and 38 for 2 SD below the mean; on the California Verbal Learning Test - II learning trials, 39 (1.5 SD) and 35 (2 SD); and on the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised learning trials, 17 (1.5 SD) and 16 (2 SD).
CONCLUSIONS: Cut scores can accurately identify cognitive impairment on all subtests of the BICAMS. Use of cut scores may improve the efficiency of screening for cognitive impairment by reducing administrative burden and simplifying interpretation.
METHODS: This study utilized data collected from MS Centers in the United States. ROC curve analysis identified cut scores yielding the best balance of sensitivity and specificity. We tested two definitions of impairment: 1.5 and 2 standard deviations (SD) below the normative mean.
RESULTS: All cut scores yielded excellent or good sensitivity and specificity for identifying impaired cognitive performance. The following cut scores yielded the best balance between sensitivity and specificity: On the Symbol Digit Modalities Test, 44 for 1.5 SD below the mean and 38 for 2 SD below the mean; on the California Verbal Learning Test - II learning trials, 39 (1.5 SD) and 35 (2 SD); and on the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised learning trials, 17 (1.5 SD) and 16 (2 SD).
CONCLUSIONS: Cut scores can accurately identify cognitive impairment on all subtests of the BICAMS. Use of cut scores may improve the efficiency of screening for cognitive impairment by reducing administrative burden and simplifying interpretation.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app