Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparison of Neovascular Lesion Area Measurements From Different Swept-Source OCT Angiographic Scan Patterns in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Purpose: We compared area measurements for the same neovascular lesions imaged using swept source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) and enlarging scan patterns.

Methods: Patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration were imaged using a 100-kHz SS-OCTA instrument (PLEX Elite 9000). The scanning protocols included the 3 × 3, 6 × 6, 9 × 9, and 12 × 12 mm fields of view. Two groups were studied. Group 1 included small lesions contained within the 3 \( \times \) 3 mm scan, and Group 2 included larger lesions that were fully contained within the 6 \( \times \) 6 mm scan.

Results: A total of 30 eyes of 26 patients were enrolled in Group 1 and 30 eyes of 25 patients were enrolled in Group 2. In Group 1, the automated mean lesion area measurements were 1.11 (SD = 0.78), 1.14 (SD = 0.80), and 1.27 (SD = 0.82) mm2 for the 3 \( \times \) 3, 6 \( \times \) 6, and 12 \( \times \) 12 mm scans, respectively (ANOVA P < 0.001; post hoc comparisons, P = 0.184, 3 \( \times \) 3 vs. 6 \( \times \) 6 mm; P < 0.001 for the other two pairs). In Group 2, the automated mean lesion area measurements were 5.43 (SD = 2.56), 5.53 (SD = 2.48), and 5.49 (SD = 2.65) mm2 for the 6 \( \times \) 6, 9 \( \times \) 9, and 12 \( \times \) 12 mm scans, respectively (ANOVA P = 0.435; post-hoc comparisons, P = 0.062, 6 \( \times \) 6 vs. 9 \( \times \) 9 mm; P = 0.553, 6 \( \times \) 6 vs. 12 \( \times \) 12 mm; P = 0.654, 9 \( \times \) 9 vs. 12 \( \times \) 12 mm).

Conclusions: The similarity in lesion area measurements across different scan patterns suggests that SS-OCTA imaging can be used to follow quantitatively the enlargement of choroidal neovascularization as the disease progresses.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app