We have located links that may give you full text access.
Pediatric Calvarial Bone Thickness in Patients With and Without Aural Atresia.
Otology & Neurotology 2017 December
OBJECTIVE: To compare temporal bone thickness along a three-dimensional arc of potential osseointegrated implant sites for bone-anchored hearing aids in children with and without aural atresia using computed tomographic imaging (CT).
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case review.
SETTING: Tertiary children's hospital.
PATIENTS: Children with or without aural atresia aged less than 11 years who had a temporal bone CT.
INTERVENTION (S): Calvarial bone volume on CT was rendered in three-dimensional and thickness was reconstructed and measured at up to 12 defined sites along an arc of recommended implant sites.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE (S): Determining whether a majority of observed potential implant sites have 2, 3, or 4 mm of bone thickness while controlling for age differences and atresia status.
RESULTS: A total of 40 atretic (from 34 patients) and 34 control (from 34 patients) temporal bones were compared using CT. Likelihood ratio tests indicated that diagnosis did not have a statistically significant effect on whether patients reached thresholds of 2, 3, or 4 mm at most observed sites (p = 0.781, 0.773, and 0.529, respectively) when adjusting for age. For all children measured, 93% had >50% of measured points greater than or equal to 2 mm thick.
CONCLUSION: Most children had greater than 2 mm of temporal bone thickness at >50% of the sites measured regardless of age or atresia diagnosis. The likelihood of reaching 4 mm of thickness at most sites improves with age. In unilateral patients, there was not a significant difference in thickness between affected and unaffected sides. There was also no significant difference in thickness when comparing patients with atresia to those without.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case review.
SETTING: Tertiary children's hospital.
PATIENTS: Children with or without aural atresia aged less than 11 years who had a temporal bone CT.
INTERVENTION (S): Calvarial bone volume on CT was rendered in three-dimensional and thickness was reconstructed and measured at up to 12 defined sites along an arc of recommended implant sites.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE (S): Determining whether a majority of observed potential implant sites have 2, 3, or 4 mm of bone thickness while controlling for age differences and atresia status.
RESULTS: A total of 40 atretic (from 34 patients) and 34 control (from 34 patients) temporal bones were compared using CT. Likelihood ratio tests indicated that diagnosis did not have a statistically significant effect on whether patients reached thresholds of 2, 3, or 4 mm at most observed sites (p = 0.781, 0.773, and 0.529, respectively) when adjusting for age. For all children measured, 93% had >50% of measured points greater than or equal to 2 mm thick.
CONCLUSION: Most children had greater than 2 mm of temporal bone thickness at >50% of the sites measured regardless of age or atresia diagnosis. The likelihood of reaching 4 mm of thickness at most sites improves with age. In unilateral patients, there was not a significant difference in thickness between affected and unaffected sides. There was also no significant difference in thickness when comparing patients with atresia to those without.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app