We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
META-ANALYSIS
REVIEW
The association between diabetes/hyperglycemia and the prognosis of cervical cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Medicine (Baltimore) 2017 October
BACKGROUND: The predictive roles of diabetes in the prognosis of many types of cancer have been well studied, but its role in predicting the prognosis of cervical cancer is still controversial. The aim of the study is to evaluate the association between diabetes/hyperglycemia and the prognosis of cervical cancer.
METHODS: We conducted a systematic review for peer-reviewed studies indexed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Wanfang published before December 2016. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were pooled in the meta-analysis.
RESULTS: This systematic review identified 13 studies with a total of 11,091 cervical cancer patients, of which 11 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The study indicated that diabetes was related to poorer overall survival (HR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.35-1.87, P < .001) and poorer recurrence-free survival (HR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.47-2.66, P < .001) in cervical cancer patients. The meta-analysis of adjusted HRs also indicated that diabetes was independently associated with poor overall survival (HR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.38-2.05, P < .001) and poor recurrence-free survival (HR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.47-2.66, P < .001) in cervical cancer patients. Sensitivity analysis and subgroup analyses showed similar results. No significant heterogeneity was observed for the included studies.
CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis suggests that diabetes is an important predictive factor for cervical cancer prognosis, and it is linked to poorer survival of cervical cancer patients. Diabetes can serve as a useful index in the prognostic evaluation for patients with cervical cancer.
METHODS: We conducted a systematic review for peer-reviewed studies indexed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Wanfang published before December 2016. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were pooled in the meta-analysis.
RESULTS: This systematic review identified 13 studies with a total of 11,091 cervical cancer patients, of which 11 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The study indicated that diabetes was related to poorer overall survival (HR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.35-1.87, P < .001) and poorer recurrence-free survival (HR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.47-2.66, P < .001) in cervical cancer patients. The meta-analysis of adjusted HRs also indicated that diabetes was independently associated with poor overall survival (HR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.38-2.05, P < .001) and poor recurrence-free survival (HR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.47-2.66, P < .001) in cervical cancer patients. Sensitivity analysis and subgroup analyses showed similar results. No significant heterogeneity was observed for the included studies.
CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis suggests that diabetes is an important predictive factor for cervical cancer prognosis, and it is linked to poorer survival of cervical cancer patients. Diabetes can serve as a useful index in the prognostic evaluation for patients with cervical cancer.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app