EVALUATION STUDIES
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Evaluation of single vs pooled swab cultures for detecting MRSA colonization.

BACKGROUND: The costs and laboratory workload arising from meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) screening could be reduced markedly by processing nose, throat and skin swabs from one person in a single culture broth (specimen pooling). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivities and times for MRSA detection using a variety of approaches to processing of individual and pooled swabs.

METHODS: Four hundred and seventeen swabs from 139 subjects with a history of MRSA colonization (three swabs per subject - nose, throat and skin) were submitted. Swabs were suspended in 200-μL sterile saline, and these suspensions were used individually and as pooled samples to inoculate two different chromogenic media [MRSA SMART (bioMėrieux, Marcy-l'Étoile, Paris, France) and CHROMagar MRSA (CHROMagar, Paris, France)] and Todd-Hewitt Broth; the latter cultures were then subcultured on to the same chromogenic media.

RESULTS: MRSA was detected from at least one specimen in 75 subjects (50.4%). The diagnostic sensitivities of pooled surveillance cultures compared with single cultures were 97% and 93% for direct and enrichment cultures, respectively. Enrichment culture of either individual or pooled samples had no benefit compared with direct culture (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: Pooling of MRSA screening swabs for either direct culture on chromogenic agar or enrichment culture is suitable for routine use.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app