Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Apical four-chamber longitudinal left ventricular strain in patients with aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: analysis related with flow/gradient pattern and association with outcome.

Aims: To evaluate the prognostic value of apical four-chamber (A4-C) longitudinal strain (LS) in patients with aortic stenosis (AS).

Methods and results: In a multicentre cohort, 582 patients (74.3 ± 10.9 years) with moderate or severe AS and preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (≥50%) were included in this retrospective study. Patients with severe AS were classified in four subgroups according to flow and gradient: low flow (LF) was defined as a stroke volume index <35 mL/m2 compared with normal flow (NF); low-gradient (LG) as a mean gradient <40 mmHg compared with high gradient (HG). The end point was all-cause of mortality. A4-C LS was measured by two-dimensional speckle tracking and was feasible in all patients. The degree of A4-C LV longitudinal dysfunction increased according to the severity and subgroups of severe AS: from the least to the most impaired: moderate AS, NF/HG, NF/LG, LF/HG, and LF/LG AS (P < 0.001). During a mean follow-up of 2.6 ± 0.2 years, 58(10%) patients died. The 2-year survival was 76.8% in patients with LF/LG vs. 89.3% in patients with other groups. The best threshold of A4-C LS associated with overall mortality was an absolute cut-off value of |13.75%|. According to this cut-off, the 2-year survival was higher both in patients with moderate AS (96.3 vs. 70%, P = 0.02) and those with severe AS (92.9 vs. 80.9%, P = 0.005). However when dichotomized according to flow/gradient patterns, the association was only statistically significant in the subgroup of patients with NF/HG. By multivariable cox regression analysis, A4-C LS <|13.75| remained independently associated with overall mortality (hazard ratio: 1.8; P = 0.045).

Conclusion: A4-C LS is independently associated with death in patients with AS and preserved LVEF, however the flow/gradient pattern should also be considered as an important parameter. The management of these patients may use A4-C LS as a new parameter of evaluation of LV function and prognosis.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app