We have located links that may give you full text access.
Novel Method of Measuring Canal Dehiscence and Evaluation of its Potential as a Predictor of Symptom Outcomes After Middle Fossa Craniotomy.
Neurosurgery 2018 September 2
BACKGROUND: Superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) is an osseous defect of the arcuate eminence of the petrous temporal bone. Strategies for measuring dehiscence size are variable, and the usefulness of such parameters remains in clinical equipoise.
OBJECTIVE: To present a novel method of measuring dehiscence volume and to evaluate its potential as a predictor of symptom outcomes after surgical repair of SSCD.
METHODS: High-resolution computed tomographic temporal bone images were imported into a freely available segmentation software. Dehiscence lengths and volumes were ascertained by independent authors. Inter-rater observer reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Correlation and regression analyses were performed to evaluate for relationships between dehiscence size and symptoms (pre- and post-operative).
RESULTS: Thirty-seven dehiscences were segmented using the novel volumetric assessment. Cronbach's alpha for dehiscence lengths and volumes were 0.97 and 0.95, respectively. Dehiscence lengths were more variable as compared to dehiscence volumes (σ2 8.92 vs σ2 0.55, F = 1.74). The mean dehiscence volume was 2.22 mm3 (0.74, 0.64-0.53 mm3). Dehiscence volume and headache at presentation were positively correlated (Rpb = 0.67, P = .03). Dehiscence volume and vertigo improvement after surgery were positively correlated, although this did not reach statistical significance (Rpb = 0.46, P = .21).
CONCLUSION: SSCD volumetry is a novel method of measuring dehiscence size that has excellent inter-rater reliability and is less variable compared to dehiscence length, but its potential as a predictor of symptom outcomes is not substantiated. However, the study is limited by low power.
OBJECTIVE: To present a novel method of measuring dehiscence volume and to evaluate its potential as a predictor of symptom outcomes after surgical repair of SSCD.
METHODS: High-resolution computed tomographic temporal bone images were imported into a freely available segmentation software. Dehiscence lengths and volumes were ascertained by independent authors. Inter-rater observer reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Correlation and regression analyses were performed to evaluate for relationships between dehiscence size and symptoms (pre- and post-operative).
RESULTS: Thirty-seven dehiscences were segmented using the novel volumetric assessment. Cronbach's alpha for dehiscence lengths and volumes were 0.97 and 0.95, respectively. Dehiscence lengths were more variable as compared to dehiscence volumes (σ2 8.92 vs σ2 0.55, F = 1.74). The mean dehiscence volume was 2.22 mm3 (0.74, 0.64-0.53 mm3). Dehiscence volume and headache at presentation were positively correlated (Rpb = 0.67, P = .03). Dehiscence volume and vertigo improvement after surgery were positively correlated, although this did not reach statistical significance (Rpb = 0.46, P = .21).
CONCLUSION: SSCD volumetry is a novel method of measuring dehiscence size that has excellent inter-rater reliability and is less variable compared to dehiscence length, but its potential as a predictor of symptom outcomes is not substantiated. However, the study is limited by low power.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app