We have located links that may give you full text access.
Intrarater and interrater reliability of a hand-held dynamometric technique to quantify palmar thumb abduction strength in individuals with and without carpal tunnel syndrome.
Journal of Hand Therapy : Official Journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists 2017 September 22
STUDY DESIGN: Clinical measurement.
INTRODUCTION: Individuals with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) sometimes exhibit weakness of palmar abduction strength (TAS). Reliable assessment of this strength in both subjects with and without CTS with the commonly available Microfet 2 is not known.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The purpose of this study was to determine the intrarater and interrater reliabilities of a handheld dynamometric (HHD) method to assess TAS in individuals with and without CTS using the commercially available MicroFET2 and to examine the association between TAS in individuals with CTS and the Carpal Tunnel Symptom Questionnaire (CTSQ) scores.
METHODS: In 2 different study phases, individuals with and without CTS were assessed for TAS by 2 different examiners. The CTSQ was administered to the individuals with CTS.
RESULTS: Intrarater and interrater reliability coefficients (0.89-0.93 and 0.82-0.90, respectively) were excellent in individuals with and without CTS. Weak negative correlations were found between TAS and overall CTSQ and symptom severity subscale scores, and a moderate negative correlation was found between TAS and functional Status Subscale score.
DISCUSSION: This HHD method of reliably assessing TAS better quantifies deficits and progress than traditional manual muscle testing for muscle grades greater than 3/5.
CONCLUSION: This method of HHD reliably quantifies TAS but is more reliable with the same than different raters.
INTRODUCTION: Individuals with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) sometimes exhibit weakness of palmar abduction strength (TAS). Reliable assessment of this strength in both subjects with and without CTS with the commonly available Microfet 2 is not known.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The purpose of this study was to determine the intrarater and interrater reliabilities of a handheld dynamometric (HHD) method to assess TAS in individuals with and without CTS using the commercially available MicroFET2 and to examine the association between TAS in individuals with CTS and the Carpal Tunnel Symptom Questionnaire (CTSQ) scores.
METHODS: In 2 different study phases, individuals with and without CTS were assessed for TAS by 2 different examiners. The CTSQ was administered to the individuals with CTS.
RESULTS: Intrarater and interrater reliability coefficients (0.89-0.93 and 0.82-0.90, respectively) were excellent in individuals with and without CTS. Weak negative correlations were found between TAS and overall CTSQ and symptom severity subscale scores, and a moderate negative correlation was found between TAS and functional Status Subscale score.
DISCUSSION: This HHD method of reliably assessing TAS better quantifies deficits and progress than traditional manual muscle testing for muscle grades greater than 3/5.
CONCLUSION: This method of HHD reliably quantifies TAS but is more reliable with the same than different raters.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app