We have located links that may give you full text access.
Evaluation of an Evidence-Based Throat-Pain Protocol to Reduce Left-Without-Being-Seen, Length of Stay, and Antibiotic Prescribing.
BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of people are seeking unscheduled medical care in United States' emergency departments, which contributes to delayed throughput and increased patient length of stay. Implementation of nurse-initiated protocols, such as those for throat pain, initiates early diagnostic testing, optimizes patient throughput strategies, and promotes adherence to clinic practice guidelines for an additional segment of patients.
AIM: To evaluate the effect of an evidence-based throat-pain protocol.
METHODS: The medical records for 117 patients presenting with throat pain to the emergency department were reviewed and separated into 3 groups: no testing, medical provider-initiated testing, or nurse-initiated testing using the protocol. Main outcome variables were number of patients that left without being seen (LWBS), patient length of stay, and antibiotic prescribing.
RESULTS: No patients LWBS from the nurse-initiated testing group or no-testing group compared with 3% from the medical provider-initiated group. By eliminating these LWBS patients, there is a potential cost savings of $3,420 over a 12-month period. The overall mean length of stay was 6 minutes shorter in the nurse-initiated group than the other 2 groups evaluated. Antibiotic prescriptions were given for 48% of patients in the protocol group compared with 52% in the medical provider group and 70% in the no-testing group.
CONCLUSION: Although this department has only partially implemented a protocol for throat pain, it highlights the benefits to reduce the number of patients that LWBS and reduce patient length of stay. The use of the protocol also improved adherence to clinical practice guidelines for testing and antibiotic prescribing.
AIM: To evaluate the effect of an evidence-based throat-pain protocol.
METHODS: The medical records for 117 patients presenting with throat pain to the emergency department were reviewed and separated into 3 groups: no testing, medical provider-initiated testing, or nurse-initiated testing using the protocol. Main outcome variables were number of patients that left without being seen (LWBS), patient length of stay, and antibiotic prescribing.
RESULTS: No patients LWBS from the nurse-initiated testing group or no-testing group compared with 3% from the medical provider-initiated group. By eliminating these LWBS patients, there is a potential cost savings of $3,420 over a 12-month period. The overall mean length of stay was 6 minutes shorter in the nurse-initiated group than the other 2 groups evaluated. Antibiotic prescriptions were given for 48% of patients in the protocol group compared with 52% in the medical provider group and 70% in the no-testing group.
CONCLUSION: Although this department has only partially implemented a protocol for throat pain, it highlights the benefits to reduce the number of patients that LWBS and reduce patient length of stay. The use of the protocol also improved adherence to clinical practice guidelines for testing and antibiotic prescribing.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app